Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27229190›Full record

Observational studyLancet (London, England)2016

Changes in conceptions in women younger than 18 years and the circumstances of young mothers in England in 2000-12: an observational study.

Kaye Wellings, Melissa J Palmer, Rebecca S Geary, Lorna J Gibson, Andrew Copas, Jessica Datta, Anna Glasier, Rachel H Scott, Catherine H Mercer, Bob Erens and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lancet (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adolescent Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy in Britain and the U.S.: A Multidecade Comparison.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaye WellingsCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: kaye.wellings@lshtm.ac.uk.
Melissa J PalmerCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rebecca S GearyResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lorna J GibsonCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andrew CopasResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jessica DattaCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Anna GlasierFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rachel H ScottCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Catherine H MercerResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Bob ErensDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Wendy MacdowallCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rebecca S FrenchCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kyle JonesResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Anne M JohnsonResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Clare TantonResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Paul WilkinsonCentre for Sexual and Reproductive Health Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0701757Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2000, a 10-year Teenage Pregnancy Strategy was launched in England to reduce conceptions in women younger than 18 years and social exclusion in young parents. We used routinely collected data and data from Britain's National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal) to examine progress towards these goals.

methodsIn this observational study, we used random-effects meta-regression to analyse the change in conception rates from 1994-98 to 2009-13 by top-tier local authorities in England, in relation to Teenage Pregnancy Strategy-related expenditure per head, socioeconomic deprivation, and region. Data from similar probability sample surveys: Natsal-1 (1990-91), Natsal-2 (1999-2001), and Natsal-3 (2010-12) were used to assess the prevalence of risk factors and their association with conception in women younger than 18 years in women aged 18-24 years; and the prevalence of participation in education, work, and training in young mothers.

findingsConception rates in women younger than 18 years declined steadily from their peak in 1996-98 and more rapidly from 2007 onwards. More deprived areas and those receiving greater Teenage Pregnancy Strategy-related investment had higher rates of conception in 1994-98 and had greater declines to 2009-13. Regression analyses assessing the association between Teenage Pregnancy Strategy funding and decline in conception rates in women younger than 18 years showed an estimated reduction in the conception rate of 11.4 conceptions (95% CI 9.6-13.2; p<0.0001) per 1000 women aged 15-17 years for every £100 Teenage Pregnancy Strategy spend per head and a reduction of 8.2 conceptions (5.8-10.5; p<0.0001) after adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation and region. The association between conception in women younger than 18 years and lower socioeconomic status weakened slightly between Natsal-2 and Natsal-3. The prevalence of participation in education, work, or training among young women with a child conceived before age 18 years was low, but the odds of them doing so doubled between Natsal-2 and Natsal-3 (odds ratio 1.99, 95% CI 0.99-4.00).

interpretationA sustained, multifaceted policy intervention involving health and education agencies, alongside other social and educational changes, has probably contributed to a substantial and accelerating decline in conceptions in women younger than 18 years in England since the late 1990s.

fundingMedical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Economic and Social Research Council, and Department of Health.

Indexed as

AdolescentEnglandFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLife StyleMothersPregnancyPregnancy in AdolescencePregnancy RatePrevalenceRegression AnalysisSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID27229190
PMCPMC4976101
OpenAlexW2403556497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.