Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27229002›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2016

Comparing Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Intracochlear Distortion Products Inferred from a Noninvasive Assay.

Glen K Martin, Barden B Stagner, Wei Dong, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Mice Above and Below the Eliciting Primaries.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Does the "Reticular Lamina Nonlinearity" Contribute to the Basal DPOAE Source?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cochlear hair cell densities in the rabbit.Anatomical science international · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estimation of Round-Trip Outer-Middle Ear Gain Using DPOAEs.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Glen K MartinResearch Service, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, 11201 Benton Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92357-1000, USA. glen.martin2@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-3356-9960
Barden B StagnerResearch Service, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, 11201 Benton Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92357-1000, USA.
Wei DongResearch Service, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, 11201 Benton Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92357-1000, USA.
Brenda L Lonsbury-MartinResearch Service, VA Loma Linda Healthcare System, 11201 Benton Street, Loma Linda, CA, 92357-1000, USA.
Loma Linda University · USVA Loma Linda Healthcare System · US

Funding

OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION COCHLEOGRAPHYR01DC000613 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, GLEN K. · 1989 to 2013
$5.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000613RRD VA I01 RX000268RRD VA I01 RX001965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behavior of intracochlear distortion products (iDPs) was inferred by interacting a probe tone (f3) with the iDP of interest to produce a "secondary" distortion product otoacoustic emission termed DPOAE(2ry). Measures of the DPOAE(2ry) were then used to deduce the properties of the iDP. This approach was used in alert rabbits and anesthetized gerbils to compare ear-canal 2f1-f2 and 2f2-f1 DPOAE f2/f1 ratio functions, level/phase (L/P) maps, and interference-response areas (IRAs) to their simultaneously collected DPOAE(2ry) counterparts. These same measures were also collected in a human volunteer to demonstrate similarities with their laboratory animal counterparts and their potential applicability to humans. Results showed that DPOAEs and inferred iDPs evidenced distinct behaviors and properties. That is, DPOAE ratio functions elicited by low-level primaries peaked around an f2/f1 = 1.21 or 1.25, depending on species, while the corresponding inferred iDP ratio functions peaked at f2/f1 ratios of ~1. Additionally, L/P maps showed rapid phase variation with DPOAE frequency (fdp) for the narrow-ratio 2f1-f2 and all 2f2-f1 DPOAEs, while the corresponding DPOAE(2ry) measures evidenced relatively constant phases. Common features of narrow-ratio DPOAE IRAs, such as large enhancements for interference tones (ITs) presented above f2, were not present in DPOAE(2ry) IRAs. Finally, based on prior experiments in gerbils, the behavior of the iDP directly measured in intracochlear pressure was compared to the iDP inferred from the DPOAE(2ry) and found to be similar. Together, these findings are consistent with the notion that under certain conditions, ear-canal DPOAEs provide poor representations of iDPs and thus support a "beamforming" hypothesis. According to this concept, distributed emission components directed toward the ear canal from the f2 and basal to f2 regions can be of differing phases and thus cancel, while these same components directed toward fdp add in phase.

Indexed as

Otoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousAnimalsCochleaFemaleGerbillinaeHumansRabbitsDPOAEsgerbilhumanintracochlear pressurerabbit

Identifiers

PMID27229002
PMCPMC4940284
OpenAlexW2401329148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.