Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27228560›Full record

ArticleChemical reviews2016

Crystal Nucleation in Liquids: Open Questions and Future Challenges in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Gabriele C Sosso, Ji Chen, Stephen J Cox, Martin Fitzner, Philipp Pedevilla, Andrea Zen, Angelos Michaelides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid Exploration of Mixture Adsorption via Adiabatic Sampling.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Structural Design of Bismuth Telluride Nanoplates through Process Variables.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The role of fluctuations in the nucleation process.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriele C SossoThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Ji ChenThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Stephen J CoxThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Martin FitznerThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Philipp PedevillaThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Andrea ZenThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.
Angelos MichaelidesThomas Young Centre, London Centre for Nanotechnology and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street WC1E 6BT London, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nucleation of crystals in liquids is one of nature's most ubiquitous phenomena, playing an important role in areas such as climate change and the production of drugs. As the early stages of nucleation involve exceedingly small time and length scales, atomistic computer simulations can provide unique insights into the microscopic aspects of crystallization. In this review, we take stock of the numerous molecular dynamics simulations that, in the past few decades, have unraveled crucial aspects of crystal nucleation in liquids. We put into context the theoretical framework of classical nucleation theory and the state-of-the-art computational methods by reviewing simulations of such processes as ice nucleation and the crystallization of molecules in solutions. We shall see that molecular dynamics simulations have provided key insights into diverse nucleation scenarios, ranging from colloidal particles to natural gas hydrates, and that, as a result, the general applicability of classical nucleation theory has been repeatedly called into question. We have attempted to identify the most pressing open questions in the field. We believe that, by improving (i) existing interatomic potentials and (ii) currently available enhanced sampling methods, the community can move toward accurate investigations of realistic systems of practical interest, thus bringing simulations a step closer to experiments.

Identifiers

PMID27228560
PMCPMC4919765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.