Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27228507›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

A well-baby peer counseling program is not associated with human milk receipt in the NICU.

E Cornell, T Lerer, J I Hagadorn, D J Chapman, M Lussier, E Brownell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E CornellConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Department of Research, Hartford, CT, USA.
T LererConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Department of Research, Hartford, CT, USA.
J I HagadornDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
D J ChapmanSpringfield College, Springfield, MA, USA.
M LussierConnecticut Human Milk Research Center, Division of Neonatology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
E BrownellDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate the impact of a non-neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-specific peer counseling (PC) program on the cessation of human milk receipt at and post-NICU discharge. STUDY

designA multivariable logistic regression model used data from 400 mother-infant dyads from a level IV NICU to compare cessation of human milk receipt at NICU discharge by PC program status. Kaplan-Meier distributions and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model assessed the relationship between participants/non-participants and cessation of human milk post-NICU discharge.

resultsNo statistically significant differences between groups in cessation of human milk either by or post-discharge were observed. Identified variables associated with the outcome(s) of interest included maternal and infant age, length of stay, presence of a breastfeeding duration goal and frequency of NICU lactation consultant contact.

conclusionExposure to a non NICU-specific PC program was not associated with human milk receipt either by or post-NICU discharge.

Indexed as

Milk, HumanMothersPeer GroupConnecticutCounselingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient DischargeProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27228507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.