Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27228001›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Clinical Impact of MALDI-TOF MS Identification and Rapid Susceptibility Testing on Adequate Antimicrobial Treatment in Sepsis with Positive Blood Cultures.

Alexia Verroken, Lydwine Defourny, Olivier le Polain de Waroux, Leïla Belkhir, Pierre-François Laterre, Michel Delmée, Youri Glupczynski

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Comparative analytical performance of Autof MS2600 and Biotyper Sirius for rapid MALDI-TOF MS identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of a new protocol for rapid identification ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Early diagnosis of monomicrobialJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Diagnostic test accuracy of an automated device for the MALDI target preparation for microbial identification.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Unresolved issues in the epidemiology and diagnosis of bacteremia: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  20. Rapid techniques for therapeutic optimization. Diagnostic stewardship.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexia VerrokenInstitut de recherche expérimentale et clinique (IREC), pôle de microbiologie (MBLG), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Lydwine DefournyLaboratoire de microbiologie, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc - Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Olivier le Polain de WarouxDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Leïla BelkhirDépartement de médecine interne et pathologies infectieuses, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc - Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Pierre-François LaterreDépartement des soins intensifs, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc - Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel DelméeInstitut de recherche expérimentale et clinique (IREC), pôle de microbiologie (MBLG), Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Youri GlupczynskiNational Reference Centre for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance in Gram-negative bacteria, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BECHU Dinant Godinne UCL Namur · BELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUCLouvain · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortening the turn-around time (TAT) of positive blood culture (BC) identification (ID) and susceptibility results is essential to optimize antimicrobial treatment in patients with sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the impact on antimicrobial prescription of a modified workflow of positive BCs providing ID and partial susceptibility results for Enterobacteriaceae (EB), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus on the day of BC positivity detection. This study was divided into a pre-intervention period (P0) with a standard BC workflow followed by 2 intervention periods (P1, P2) with an identical modified workflow. ID was performed with MALDI-TOF MS from blood, on early or on overnight subcultures. According to ID results, rapid phenotypic assays were realized to detect third generation cephalosporin resistant EB/P. aeruginosa or methicillin resistant S. aureus. Results were transmitted to the antimicrobial stewardship team for patient's treatment revision. Times to ID, to susceptibility results and to optimal antimicrobial treatment (OAT) were compared across the three study periods. Overall, 134, 112 and 154 positive BC episodes in P0, P1 and P2 respectively were included in the analysis. Mean time to ID (28.3 hours in P0) was reduced by 65.3% in P1 (10.2 hours) and 61.8% in P2 (10.8 hours). Mean time to complete susceptibility results was reduced by 27.5% in P1 and 27% in P2, with results obtained after 32.4 and 32.6 hours compared to 44.7 hours in P0. Rapid tests allowed partial susceptibility results to be obtained after a mean time of 11.8 hours in P1 and 11.7 hours in P2. Mean time to OAT was decreased to 21.6 hours in P1 and to 17.9 hours in P2 compared to 36.1 hours in P0. Reducing TAT of positive BC with MALDI-TOF MS ID and rapid susceptibility testing accelerated prescription of targeted antimicrobial treatment thereby potentially improving the patients' clinical outcome.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacteriological TechniquesBlood CultureHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSepsisSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationStaphylococcal InfectionsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID27228001
PMCPMC4881997
OpenAlexW2408523244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.