Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227979›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Membrane Insertion for the Detection of Lipopolysaccharides: Exploring the Dynamics of Amphiphile-in-Lipid Assays.

Loreen R Stromberg, Nicolas W Hengartner, Kirstie L Swingle, Rodney A Moxley, Steven W Graves, Gabriel A Montaño, Harshini Mukundan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A two-step bioconjugation ofRSC chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Conditions for Handling and Optimal Storage of Mycolactone.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Loreen R StrombergCenter for Biomedical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Nicolas W HengartnerTheoretical Biology and Biophysics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Kirstie L SwingleCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Rodney A MoxleySchool of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Steven W GravesCenter for Biomedical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
Gabriel A MontañoCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Harshini MukundanCenter for Biomedical Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States of America.
University of New Mexico · USCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli is an important cause of foodborne illness, with cases attributable to beef, fresh produce and other sources. Many serotypes of the pathogen cause disease, and differentiating one serotype from another requires specific identification of the O antigen located on the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecule. The amphiphilic structure of LPS poses a challenge when using classical detection methods, which do not take into account its lipoglycan biochemistry. Typically, detection of LPS requires heat or chemical treatment of samples and relies on bioactivity assays for the conserved lipid A portion of the molecule. Our goal was to develop assays to facilitate the direct and discriminative detection of the entire LPS molecule and its O antigen in complex matrices using minimal sample processing. To perform serogroup identification of LPS, we used a method called membrane insertion on a waveguide biosensor, and tested three serogroups of LPS. The membrane insertion technique allows for the hydrophobic association of LPS with a lipid bilayer, where the exposed O antigen can be targeted for specific detection. Samples of beef lysate were spiked with LPS to perform O antigen specific detection of LPS from E. coli O157. To validate assay performance, we evaluated the biophysical interactions of LPS with lipid bilayers both in- and outside of a flow cell using fluorescence microscopy and fluorescently doped lipids. Our results indicate that membrane insertion allows for the qualitative and reliable identification of amphiphilic LPS in complex samples like beef homogenates. We also demonstrated that LPS-induced hole formation does not occur under the conditions of the membrane insertion assays. Together, these findings describe for the first time the serogroup-specific detection of amphiphilic LPS in complex samples using a membrane insertion assay, and highlight the importance of LPS molecular conformations in detection architectures.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCell MembraneEscherichia coli ProteinsFood MicrobiologyLipid BilayersLipopolysaccharidesO AntigensSerogroupShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLipid BilayersLipopolysaccharidesO Antigens

Identifiers

PMID27227979
PMCPMC4881986
OpenAlexW2396020136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.