ArticlePloS one2016
A Reversibly Sealed, Easy Access, Modular (SEAM) Microfluidic Architecture to Establish In Vitro Tissue Interfaces.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular Integration of Impedance Sensing for Real-Time Assessment of Barrier Integrity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Modular Microfluidic Organoid Platform Using LEGO-Like Bricks.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Microengineering 3D Collagen Matrices with Tumor-Mimetic Gradients in Fiber Alignment.Advanced functional materials · 2024Article
- Transforming Static Barrier Tissue Models into Dynamic Microphysiological Systems.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024Article
- Integration of Extracellular Matrices into Organ-on-Chip Systems.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Review
- Electropatterning-Contemporary developments for selective particle arrangements employing electrokinetics.Electrophoresis · 2023Review
- The Modular µSiM Reconfigured: Integration of Microfluidic Capabilities to Study In Vitro Barrier Tissue Models under Flow.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Microengineering 3D Collagen Hydrogels with Long-Range Fiber Alignment.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2022Article
- Modular Microfluidics: Current Status and Future Prospects.Micromachines · 2022Review
- A miniaturized 3D printed pressure regulator (µPR) for microfluidic cell culture applications.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Local extensional flows promote long-range fiber alignment in 3D collagen hydrogels.Biofabrication · 2022Article
- Basement membrane properties and their recapitulation in organ-on-chip applications.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Skin-on-a-Chip Technology: Microengineering Physiologically Relevant In Vitro Skin Models.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Chips for Biomaterials and Biomaterials for Chips: Recent Advances at the Interface between Microfabrication and Biomaterials Research.Advanced healthcare materials · 2021Review
- Engineering fiber anisotropy within natural collagen hydrogels.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021Review
- Microengineered 3D Collagen Gels with Independently Tunable Fiber Anisotropy and Directionality.Advanced materials technologies · 2021Article
- Advanced Fabrication Techniques of Microengineered Physiological Systems.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Lab-on-a-Chip Technologies for the Single Cell Level: Separation, Analysis, and Diagnostics.Micromachines · 2020Review
- A Low-Cost, Rapidly Integrated Debubbler (RID) Module for Microfluidic Cell Culture Applications.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Glioblastoma adhesion in a quick-fit hybrid microdevice.Biomedical microdevices · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidic barrier tissue models have emerged as advanced in vitro tools to explore interactions with external stimuli such as drug candidates, pathogens, or toxins. However, the procedures required to establish and maintain these systems can be challenging to implement for end users, particularly those without significant in-house engineering expertise. Here we present a module-based approach that provides an easy-to-use workflow to establish, maintain, and analyze microscale tissue constructs. Our approach begins with a removable culture insert that is magnetically coupled, decoupled, and transferred between standalone, prefabricated microfluidic modules for simplified cell seeding, culture, and downstream analysis. The modular approach allows several options for perfusion including standard syringe pumps or integration with a self-contained gravity-fed module for simple cell maintenance. As proof of concept, we establish a culture of primary human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC) and report combined surface protein imaging and gene expression after controlled apical stimulation with the bacterial endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS). We also demonstrate the feasibility of incorporating hydrated biomaterial interfaces into the microfluidic architecture by integrating an ultra-thin (< 1 μm), self-assembled hyaluronic acid/peptide amphiphile culture membrane with brain-specific Young's modulus (~ 1kPa). To highlight the importance of including biomimetic interfaces into microscale models we report multi-tiered readouts from primary rat cortical cells cultured on the self-assembled membrane and compare a panel of mRNA targets with primary brain tissue signatures. We anticipate that the modular approach and simplified operational workflows presented here will enable a wide range of research groups to incorporate microfluidic barrier tissue models into their work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.