Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227537›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

"I Use Weed for My ADHD": A Qualitative Analysis of Online Forum Discussions on Cannabis Use and ADHD.

John T Mitchell, Maggie M Sweitzer, Angela M Tunno, Scott H Kollins, F Joseph McClernon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cannabinoids and ADHD: a New Frontier in Neuropharmacology?Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Exploring the Link Between Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Cannabis Use Disorders: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Review
  19. Medicinal Cannabis for Paediatric Developmental, Behavioural and Mental Health Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John T MitchellDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Maggie M SweitzerDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Angela M TunnoDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Scott H KollinsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
F Joseph McClernonDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

Smoking/Nicotine Dependence in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)K24DA023464 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KOLLINS, SCOTT H · 2008 to 2018
$1.5M
Emotion Dysregulation, ADHD, and SmokingK23DA032577 · NIDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MITCHELL, JOHN T · 2012 to 2015
$566k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA032577NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA023464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a risk factor for problematic cannabis use. However, clinical and anecdotal evidence suggest an increasingly popular perception that cannabis is therapeutic for ADHD, including via online resources. Given that the Internet is increasingly utilized as a source of healthcare information and may influence perceptions, we conducted a qualitative analysis of online forum discussions, also referred to as threads, on the effects of cannabis on ADHD to systematically characterize the content patients and caregivers may encounter about ADHD and cannabis.

methodsA total of 268 separate forum threads were identified. Twenty percent (20%) were randomly selected, which yielded 55 separate forum threads (mean number of individual posts per forum thread = 17.53) scored by three raters (Cohen's kappa = 0.74). A final sample of 401 posts in these forum threads received at least one endorsement on predetermined topics following qualitative coding procedures.

resultsTwenty-five (25%) percent of individual posts indicated that cannabis is therapeutic for ADHD, as opposed to 8% that it is harmful, 5% that it is both therapeutic and harmful, and 2% that it has no effect on ADHD. This pattern was generally consistent when the year of each post was considered. The greater endorsement of therapeutic versus harmful effects of cannabis did not generalize to mood, other (non-ADHD) psychiatric conditions, or overall domains of daily life. Additional themes emerged (e.g., cannabis being considered sanctioned by healthcare providers).

conclusionsDespite that there are no clinical recommendations or systematic research supporting the beneficial effects of cannabis use for ADHD, online discussions indicate that cannabis is considered therapeutic for ADHD-this is the first study to identify such a trend. This type of online information could shape ADHD patient and caregiver perceptions, and influence cannabis use and clinical care.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCannabisPatient Education as TopicPerceptionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityFemaleHumansKnowledgeMaleMedical MarijuanaRisk FactorsMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID27227537
PMCPMC4882033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.