Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227410›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Stability and Change in Genetic and Environmental Influences on Well-Being in Response to an Intervention.

Claire M A Haworth, S Katherine Nelson, Kristin Layous, Kathryn Carter, Katherine Jacobs Bao, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Robert Plomin

Abstract readComparative StudyTwin Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Twins and Causal Inference: Leveraging Nature's Experiment.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Genome-wide analyses of psychological resilience in U.S. Army soldiers.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claire M A HaworthMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, School of Experimental Psychology & School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
S Katherine NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Sewanee: The University of the South, Sewanee, United States of America.
Kristin LayousDepartment of Psychology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States of America.
Kathryn CarterSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine Jacobs BaoDepartment of Psychology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States of America.
Sonja LyubomirskyDepartment of Psychology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, United States of America.
Robert PlominSocial, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

European Research Council 295366Medical Research Council G0901245Medical Research Council G19/2Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic and environmental influences on complex traits can change in response to developmental and environmental contexts. Here we explore the impact of a positive activity intervention on the genetic and environmental influences on well-being and mental health in a sample of 750 adolescent twins. Twins completed a 10-week online well-being intervention, consisting of kindness and gratitude tasks and matched control activities. The results showed significant improvements both in well-being and in internalizing symptoms in response to the intervention activities. We used multivariate twin analyses of repeated measures, tracking stability and change in genetic and environmental influences, to assess the impact of this environmental intervention on these variance components. The heritability of well-being remained high both before and after the intervention, and the same genetic effects were important at each stage, even as well-being increased. The overall magnitude of environmental influences was also stable across the intervention; however, different non-shared environmental influences emerged during the intervention. Our study highlights the value of exploring the innovations in non-shared environmental influences that could provide clues to the mechanisms behind improvements in well-being. The findings also emphasize that even traits strongly influenced by genetics, like well-being, are subject to change in response to environmental interventions.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionAdolescentCase-Control StudiesEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthModels, StatisticalPhenotypePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSurveys and QuestionnairesTwins, DizygoticTwins, Monozygotic

Identifiers

PMID27227410
PMCPMC4881940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.