Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227156›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance

Effectiveness of Implementation of Electronic Malaria Information System as the National Malaria Surveillance System in Thailand.

Shaojin Ma, Saranath Lawpoolsri, Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri, Amnat Khamsiriwatchara, Kasemsak Jandee, Komchaluch Taweeseneepitch, Rungrawee Pawarana, Sukanya Jaiklaew, Boonchai Kijsanayotin, Jaranit Kaewkungwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaojin Ma *Department of Tropical Hygiene (Biomedical and Health Informatics)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-9513
Saranath Lawpoolsri *Department of Tropical Hygiene (Biomedical and Health Informatics)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8455-2344
Ngamphol Soonthornworasiri *Department of Tropical Hygiene (Biomedical and Health Informatics)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1031-7979
Amnat Khamsiriwatchara *Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9715-6658
Kasemsak Jandee *Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0042-9889
Komchaluch Taweeseneepitch *Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4425-1202
Rungrawee Pawarana *Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4401-8803
Sukanya Jaiklaew *Center of Excellence for Biomedical and Public Health Informatics (BIOPHICS)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3887-4462
Boonchai Kijsanayotin *Thai Health Information Standards Development Center (THIS)Health Systems Research InstituteMinistry of Public HealthNonthaburiThailand.ORCID 0000-0001-8932-1086
Jaranit Kaewkungwal *Department of Tropical Hygiene (Biomedical and Health Informatics)Faculty of Tropical MedicineMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7916-8460
Mahidol University · THMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn moving toward malaria elimination, one strategy is to implement an active surveillance system for effective case management. Thailand has developed and implemented the electronic Malaria Information System (eMIS) capturing individualized electronic records of suspected or confirmed malaria cases.

objectiveThe main purpose of this study was to determine how well the eMIS improves the quality of Thailand's malaria surveillance system. In particular, the focus of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the eMIS in terms of the system users' perception and the system outcomes (ie, quality of data) regarding the management of malaria patients.

methodsA mixed-methods technique was used with the framework based on system effectiveness attributes: data quality, timeliness, simplicity, acceptability, flexibility, stability, and usefulness. Three methods were utilized: data records review, survey of system users, and in-depth interviews with key stakeholders. From the two highest endemic provinces, paper forms matching electronic records of 4455 noninfected and 784 malaria-infected cases were reviewed. Web-based anonymous questionnaires were distributed to all 129 eMIS data entry staff throughout Thailand, and semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 management-level officers.

resultsThe eMIS is well accepted by system users at both management and operational levels. The data quality has enabled malaria personnel to perform more effective prevention and control activities. There is evidence of practices resulting in inconsistencies and logical errors in data reporting. Critical data elements were mostly completed, except for a few related to certain dates and area classifications. Timeliness in reporting a case to the system was acceptable with a delay of 3-4 days. The evaluation of quantitative and qualitative data confirmed that the eMIS has high levels of simplicity, acceptability, stability, and flexibility.

conclusionsOverall, the system implemented has achieved its objective. The results of the study suggested that the eMIS helps improve the quality of Thailand's malaria surveillance system. As the national malaria surveillance system, the eMIS's functionalities have provided the malaria staff working at the point of care with close-to-real-time case management data quality, covering case detection, case investigation, drug compliance, and follow-up visits. Such features has led to an improvement in the quality of the malaria control program; the government officials now have quicker access to both individual and aggregated data to promptly react to possible outbreak. The eMIS thus plays one of the key roles in moving toward the national goal of malaria elimination by the next decade.

Indexed as

data qualityeMISepidemiologyevaluationmalariamixed-methodspublic health informaticssurveillance systemThailand

Identifiers

PMID27227156
PMCPMC4869224
OpenAlexW2346466419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.