Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227151›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance

Leveraging Big Data to Improve Health Awareness Campaigns: A Novel Evaluation of the Great American Smokeout.

John W Ayers, J Lee Westmaas, Eric C Leas, Adrian Benton, Yunqi Chen, Mark Dredze, Benjamin M Althouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of Answers to Queries among Anonymous Users with Gastroenterological Problems on an Internet Forum.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Monitoring Tobacco Brand Websites to Understand Marketing Strategies Aimed at Tobacco Product Users and Potential Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John W AyersGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University Chula Vista, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-8691
J Lee WestmaasAmerican Cancer Society Behavioral Research Center Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-7695
Eric C LeasUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine La Jolla, CA United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-0336
Adrian BentonHuman Language Technology Center of Excellence Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-4085
Yunqi ChenBryn Mawr College Bryn Mawr College Philadelphia, PA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5293-883X
Mark DredzeHuman Language Technology Center of Excellence Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-2474
Benjamin M AlthouseSanta Fe InstituteSanta Fe, NMUnited States; New Mexico State UniversityLas Cruces, NMUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-654X

Funding

TOBACCO TRENDS: A REAL-TIME SENTINEL FOR TOBACCO CONTROL EVALUATIONSR21CA173299 · NCI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AYERS, JOHN W, HOVELL, MELBOURNE F · 2013 to 2014
$353k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173299
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwareness campaigns are ubiquitous, but little is known about their potential effectiveness because traditional evaluations are often unfeasible. For 40 years, the "Great American Smokeout" (GASO) has encouraged media coverage and popular engagement with smoking cessation on the third Thursday of November as the nation's longest running awareness campaign.

objectiveWe proposed a novel evaluation framework for assessing awareness campaigns using the GASO as a case study by observing cessation-related news reports and Twitter postings, and cessation-related help seeking via Google, Wikipedia, and government-sponsored quitlines.

methodsTime trends (2009-2014) were analyzed using a quasi-experimental design to isolate spikes during the GASO by comparing observed outcomes on the GASO day with the simulated counterfactual had the GASO not occurred.

resultsCessation-related news typically increased by 61% (95% CI 35-87) and tweets by 13% (95% CI -21 to 48) during the GASO compared with what was expected had the GASO not occurred. Cessation-related Google searches increased by 25% (95% CI 10-40), Wikipedia page visits by 22% (95% CI -26 to 67), and quitline calls by 42% (95% CI 19-64). Cessation-related news media positively coincided with cessation tweets, Internet searches, and Wikipedia visits; for example, a 50% increase in news for any year predicted a 28% (95% CI -2 to 59) increase in tweets for the same year. Increases on the day of the GASO rivaled about two-thirds of a typical New Year's Day-the day that is assumed to see the greatest increases in cessation-related activity. In practical terms, there were about 61,000 more instances of help seeking on Google, Wikipedia, or quitlines on GASO each year than would normally be expected.

conclusionsThese findings provide actionable intelligence to improve the GASO and model how to rapidly, cost-effectively, and efficiently evaluate hundreds of awareness campaigns, nearly all for the first time.

Indexed as

big dataevaluationhealth communicationinfodemiologyinfoveillencemass mediasmoking cessationsocial mediatobacco controltwitter

Identifiers

PMID27227151
PMCPMC4869240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.