Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227144›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance

The Measles Vaccination Narrative in Twitter: A Quantitative Analysis.

Jacek Radzikowski, Anthony Stefanidis, Kathryn H Jacobsen, Arie Croitoru, Andrew Crooks, Paul L Delamater

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
57.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analyzing the vaccination debate in social media data Pre- and Post-COVID-19 pandemic.International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacek RadzikowskiCenter for Geospatial Intelligence George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9542-2190
Anthony StefanidisCenter for Geospatial Intelligence Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8165-0667
Kathryn H JacobsenDepartment of Global and Community Health George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4198-6246
Arie CroitoruCenter for Geospatial Intelligence Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-9273
Andrew CrooksDepartment of Computational and Data Sciences George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5034-6654
Paul L DelamaterDepartment of Geography and Geoinformation Science George Mason University Fairfax, VA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-9739
George Mason University · US

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence of social media is providing an alternative avenue for information exchange and opinion formation on health-related issues. Collective discourse in such media leads to the formation of a complex narrative, conveying public views and perceptions.

objectiveThis paper presents a study of Twitter narrative regarding vaccination in the aftermath of the 2015 measles outbreak, both in terms of its cyber and physical characteristics. We aimed to contribute to the analysis of the data, as well as presenting a quantitative interdisciplinary approach to analyze such open-source data in the context of health narratives.

methodsWe collected 669,136 tweets referring to vaccination from February 1 to March 9, 2015. These tweets were analyzed to identify key terms, connections among such terms, retweet patterns, the structure of the narrative, and connections to the geographical space.

resultsThe data analysis captures the anatomy of the themes and relations that make up the discussion about vaccination in Twitter. The results highlight the higher impact of stories contributed by news organizations compared to direct tweets by health organizations in communicating health-related information. They also capture the structure of the antivaccination narrative and its terms of reference. Analysis also revealed the relationship between community engagement in Twitter and state policies regarding child vaccination. Residents of Vermont and Oregon, the two states with the highest rates of non-medical exemption from school-entry vaccines nationwide, are leading the social media discussion in terms of participation.

conclusionsThe interdisciplinary study of health-related debates in social media across the cyber-physical debate nexus leads to a greater understanding of public concerns, views, and responses to health-related issues. Further coalescing such capabilities shows promise towards advancing health communication, thus supporting the design of more effective strategies that take into account the complex and evolving public views of health issues.

Indexed as

data analysisgeographic characteristicsGIS (geographic information systems)health informaticshealth narrativesocial media

Identifiers

PMID27227144
PMCPMC4869226
OpenAlexW2231614301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.