Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227138›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance

Implementation of a Multimodal Mobile System for Point-of-Sale Surveillance: Lessons Learned From Case Studies in Washington, DC, and New York City.

Jennifer Cantrell, Ollie Ganz, Vinu Ilakkuvan, Michael Tacelosky, Jennifer Kreslake, Joyce Moon-Howard, Angela Aidala, Donna Vallone, Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel, Thomas R Kirchner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inequitable Distribution of FTP Marketing by Neighborhood Characteristics: Further Evidence for Targeted Marketing.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer CantrellTruth InitiativeEvaluation Science and ResearchWashington, DCUnited States; Department of Health, Behavior, and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimore, MDUnited States.ORCID 0000-0003-4730-2535
Ollie GanzTruth InitiativeEvaluation Science and ResearchWashington, DCUnited States; Department of Prevention and Community HealthGeorge Washington University Milken Institute School of Public HealthWashington, DCUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-8463
Vinu IlakkuvanTruth InitiativeEvaluation Science and ResearchWashington, DCUnited States; Department of Prevention and Community HealthGeorge Washington University Milken Institute School of Public HealthWashington, DCUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-7827-0639
Michael TaceloskySurvos LLC Washington, DC United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4140-731X
Jennifer KreslakeDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-1327
Joyce Moon-HowardCollege of Global Public Health New York University New York, NY United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-4193
Angela AidalaDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health New York, NY United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4425-6935
Donna ValloneTruth InitiativeEvaluation Science and ResearchWashington, DCUnited States; College of Global Public HealthNew York UniversityNew York, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-9333
Andrew Anesetti-RothermelSteven A Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies Truth Initiative Washington, DC United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6034-8768
Thomas R KirchnerDepartment of Health, Behavior, and SocietyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimore, MDUnited States; College of Global Public HealthNew York UniversityNew York, NYUnited States; Department of OncologyLombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashington, NYUnited States.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-4980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn tobacco control and other fields, point-of-sale surveillance of the retail environment is critical for understanding industry marketing of products and informing public health practice. Innovations in mobile technology can improve existing, paper-based surveillance methods, yet few studies describe in detail how to operationalize the use of technology in public health surveillance.

objectiveThe aims of this paper are to share implementation strategies and lessons learned from 2 tobacco, point-of-sale surveillance projects to inform and prepare public health researchers and practitioners to implement new mobile technologies in retail point-of-sale surveillance systems.

methodsFrom 2011 to 2013, 2 point-of-sale surveillance pilot projects were conducted in Washington, DC, and New York, New York, to capture information about the tobacco retail environment and test the feasibility of a multimodal mobile data collection system, which included capabilities for audio or video recording data, electronic photographs, electronic location data, and a centralized back-end server and dashboard. We established a preimplementation field testing process for both projects, which involved a series of rapid and iterative tests to inform decisions and establish protocols around key components of the project.

resultsImportant components of field testing included choosing a mobile phone that met project criteria, establishing an efficient workflow and accessible user interfaces for each component of the system, training and providing technical support to fieldworkers, and developing processes to integrate data from multiple sources into back-end systems that can be utilized in real-time.

conclusionsA well-planned implementation process is critical for successful use and performance of multimodal mobile surveillance systems. Guidelines for implementation include (1) the need to establish and allow time for an iterative testing framework for resolving technical and logistical challenges; (2) developing a streamlined workflow and user-friendly interfaces for data collection; (3) allowing for ongoing communication, feedback, and technology-related skill-building among all staff; and (4) supporting infrastructure for back-end data systems. Although mobile technologies are evolving rapidly, lessons learned from these case studies are essential for ensuring that the many benefits of new mobile systems for rapid point-of-sale surveillance are fully realized.

Indexed as

implementationmarketingmobile technologypoint-of-salepublic health surveillancetobaccotobacco industry advertising

Identifiers

PMID27227138
PMCPMC4869230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.