Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27227134›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance

An Integrated Service Delivery Model to Identify Persons Living with HIV and to Provide Linkage to HIV Treatment and Care in Prioritized Neighborhoods: A Geotargeted, Program Outcome Study.

Paula M Frew, Matthew Archibald, Jay Schamel, Diane Saint-Victor, Elizabeth Fox, Neena Smith-Bankhead, Dazon Dixon Diallo, Marcia M Holstad, Carlos Del Rio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review of Neighborhood Factors Impacting HIV Care Continuum Participation in the United States.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paula M FrewDivision of Infectious DiseasesDepartment of MedicineEmory University School of MedicineAtlanta, GAUnited States; Hubert Department of Global HealthRollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlanta, GAUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-9124
Matthew ArchibaldDepartment of Sociology Colby College Waterville, ME United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5801-2587
Jay SchamelDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0038-0686
Diane Saint-VictorDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-246X
Elizabeth FoxDivision of Infectious Diseases Department of Medicine Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9998-5326
Neena Smith-BankheadAID Atlanta Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-4558
Dazon Dixon DialloSisterLove, Inc. Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8693-846X
Marcia M HolstadEmory University School of Nursing Atlanta, GA United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5558-8660
Carlos Del RioDivision of Infectious DiseasesDepartment of MedicineEmory University School of MedicineAtlanta, GAUnited States; Hubert Department of Global HealthRollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlanta, GAUnited States.ORCID 0000-0002-0153-3517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have demonstrated that high human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence (2.1%) rates exist in "high-risk areas" of US cities that are comparable to rates in developing nations. Community-based interventions (CBIs) have demonstrated potential for improving HIV testing in these areas, thereby facilitating early entry and engagement in the HIV continuum of care. By encouraging neighborhood-based community participation through an organized community coalition, Project LINK sought to demonstrate the potential of the CBI concept to improve widespread HIV testing and referral in an area characterized by high poverty and HIV prevalence with few existing HIV-related services.

objectiveThis study examines the influence of Project LINK to improve linkage-to-care and HIV engagement among residents of its target neighborhoods.

methodsUsing a venue-based sampling strategy, survey participants were selected from among all adult participants aged 18 years or more at Project LINK community events (n=547). We explored multilevel factors influencing continuum-of-care outcomes (linkage to HIV testing and CBI network referral) through combined geospatial-survey analyses utilizing hierarchical linear model methodologies and random-intercept models that adjusted for baseline effect differences among zip codes. The study specifically examined participant CBI utilization and engagement in relation to individual and psychosocial factors, as well as neighborhood characteristics including the availability of HIV testing services, and the extent of local prevention, education, and clinical support services.

resultsStudy participants indicated strong mean intention to test for HIV using CBI agencies (mean 8.66 on 10-point scale [SD 2.51]) and to facilitate referrals to the program (mean 8.81 on 10-point scale [SD 1.86]). Individual-level effects were consistent across simple multiple regression and random-effects models, as well as multilevel models. Participants with lower income expressed greater intentions to obtain HIV tests through LINK (P<.01 across models). HIV testing and CBI referral intention were associated with neighborhood-level factors, including reduced availability of support services (testing P<.001), greater proportion of black/African Americans (testing and referral P<.001), and reduced socioeconomic capital (testing P=.017 and referral P<.001). Across models, participants expressing positive attitudes toward the CBI exhibited greater likelihood of engaging in routine HIV testing (P<.01) and referring others to HIV care (P<.01). Transgender individuals indicated greater intent to refer others to the CBI (P<.05). These outcomes were broadly influenced by distal community-level factors including availability of neighborhood HIV support organizations, population composition socioeconomic status, and high HIV prevalence.

conclusionsProject LINK demonstrated its potential as a geotargeted CBI by evidencing greater individual intention to engage in HIV testing, care, and personal referrals to its coalition partner organizations. This study highlights important socioecological effects of US-based CBIs to improve HIV testing and initiate acceptable mechanisms for prompt referral to care among a vulnerable population.

Indexed as

community-based organizationsHigh-Impact Preventionhuman immunodeficiency virushuman immunodeficiency virus preventionhuman immunodeficiency virus testingracial/ethnic minorities

Identifiers

PMID27227134
PMCPMC4869208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.