Pain and sedation during colonoscopy - a never ending story.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological, Non-Pharmacological, and Combined Strategies for Pain Relief During Colonoscopy: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Journal of pain research · 2025
   Review
2. A review on model-based and model-free approaches to control soft actuators and their potentials in colonoscopy.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023
   Review
3. Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
   Review
4. The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.