Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226977›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2016

Invasive ductal breast carcinoma detector that is robust to image magnification in whole digital slides.

Matthew Balazsi, Paula Blanco, Pablo Zoroquiain, Martin D Levine, Miguel N Burnier

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew BalazsiMcGill University, Centre for Intelligent Machines, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3480 University Street, City, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada; McGill University, Department of Pathology, Henry C. Witelson Laboratory, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Block E, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
Paula BlancoMcGill University , Department of Pathology, Henry C. Witelson Laboratory, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Block E, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
Pablo ZoroquiainMcGill University , Department of Pathology, Henry C. Witelson Laboratory, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Block E, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
Martin D LevineMcGill University , Centre for Intelligent Machines, Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3480 University Street, City, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2A7, Canada.
Miguel N BurnierMcGill University , Department of Pathology, Henry C. Witelson Laboratory, 1001 Boulevard Decarie, Block E, Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada.
McGill University · CAIntelligent Machines (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive ductal breast carcinomas (IDBCs) are the most frequent and aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, affecting a large number of Canadian women every year. Part of the diagnostic process includes grading the cancerous tissue at the microscopic level according to the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson system. Although reliable, there exists a growing interest in automating the grading process, which will provide consistent care for all patients. This paper presents a solution for automatically detecting regions expressing IDBC in images of microscopic tissue, or whole digital slides. This represents the first stage in a larger solution designed to automatically grade IDBC. The detector first tessellated whole digital slides, and image features were extracted, such as color information, local binary patterns, and histograms of oriented gradients. These were presented to a random forest classifier, which was trained and tested using a database of 66 cases diagnosed with IDBC. When properly tuned, the detector balanced accuracy, F1 score, and Dice's similarity coefficient were 88.7%, 79.5%, and 0.69, respectively. Overall, the results seemed strong enough to integrate our detector into a larger solution equipped with components that analyze the cancerous tissue at higher magnification, automatically producing the histopathological grade.

Indexed as

cancercomputer visionhistopathologyinvasive ductal breast carcinomamachine learningwhole digital slides

Identifiers

PMID27226977
PMCPMC4870400
OpenAlexW2402768479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.