Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226859›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2016

Aneurysmal Neck Clipping as the Primary Treatment Option for Both Ruptured and Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms.

Jai Ho Choi, Jung Eon Park, Myeong Jin Kim, Bum Su Kim, Yong Sam Shin

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07707076 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Traditional Approach Versus Flow Diverter for Unruptured Intracranial Wide-neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: a Prospective International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study (FD-BWA Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2030Enrolled266ConditionsUnruptured Intracranial Wide-neck Bifurcation AneurysmsArmsFlow Diverter Group, Stent Assisted Coiling Group
NCT07754188 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Early Complications After Flow Diverter Versus Stent-Assisted Coiling for Unruptured Wide-Neck Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Prospective Real-World Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled274ConditionsUnruptured Intracranial Aneurysm, Intracranial Bifurcation Aneurysm, Wide-Neck AneurysmArmsFlow Diverter, Stent-Assisted Coiling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jai Ho ChoiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
Jung Eon ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Myeong Jin KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.
Bum Su KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yong Sam ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms are less amenable to coil embolization, an increasing number of studies support favorable endovascular treatment for them. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of two different treatments (surgery versus coiling) and evaluate the benefits of surgical clipping for MCA aneurysms.

methodsHere we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 178 ruptured and unruptured MCA aneurysms treated in patients between September 2008 and April 2012. Parameters assessing treatment outcomes include degree of aneurysm occlusion, presence of regrowth, clinical status, and complications.

resultsAmong 178 MCA aneurysms, 153 were treated surgically. After a mean follow-up of 12 months, the surgery group showed a clinically significant complete occlusion rate (98%) compared with the coiling group (56%) (p<0.001). Follow-up radiologic evaluation showed a higher regrowth rate (four of 16 cases) in the coiling group than in the surgery group (one of 49 cases) (p=0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in favorable clinical outcome rate between the two groups. The procedure-related permanent morbidity and mortality rates were 2% (three of 153 cases) in the surgery group and 0% (0 of 25 cases) in the coiling group.

conclusionCompared to endovascular treatment, surgical neck clipping for both ruptured and unruptured MCA aneurysms results in a significantly higher complete obliteration rate and less regrowth. Therefore, even in this endovascular era, we still recommend surgical clipping as the primary treatment option for MCA aneurysms rather than coil embolization.

Indexed as

Coil embolizationIntracranial aneurysmMiddle cerebral arterySurgical clip

Identifiers

PMID27226859
PMCPMC4877550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.