Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226826›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2013

Drug reformulations and repositioning in pharmaceutical industry and its impact on market access: reassessment of nomenclature.

Susana Murteira, Zied Ghezaiel, Slim Karray, Michel Lamure

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Broad-spectrum therapeutics: A new antimicrobial class.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The promise and challenges of drug repurposing in psychiatry.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2018
    Article
  15. Repurposing of Bromocriptine for Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susana MurteiraEquipe Santé, Individu, Société-EA 4128, University of Lyon, Lyon, France; Lundbeck SAS, 37-45, Quai du Président Roosevelt, 92445 Issy-les-Moulineaux, Cedex, Paris, France.
Zied GhezaielCreativ-Ceutical S.A., 215, rue du Faubourg St-Honoré 75008 Paris, France.
Slim KarrayCreativ-Ceutical S.A., 215, rue du Faubourg St-Honoré 75008 Paris, France.
Michel LamureEquipe Santé, Individu, Société-EA 4128, University of Lyon, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedicinal products that have been developed and approved for one disease may be the object of additional clinical development in other disease areas or of additional pharmaceutical development for new and different formulations. The newly developed products can be named as repositioned or reformulated products, respectively. Market access of repositioned or reformulated products in Europe and the United States is an interesting object of study as it may provide clarity about which parameters are assessed and considered to bring added value, other than the molecule itself. As such, we aim to evaluate if the added value of repositioned or reformulated medicinal products can be systematically described, quantified, and predicted. As a first step toward investigating the impact of market access on drug research and development trends for repositioned and reformulated products, it is necessary to have consistency in the designations for the case studies evaluated in this project. In an attempt to achieve that consistency, the current study aims to propose harmonized definitions for the repositioning and reformulation strategies and to propose a taxonomy for the medicinal products derived thereof.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to collect information on existing cases of repositioning or reformulation. A search strategy was developed by defining the search objectives, targeted data sources, search keywords, and inclusion/exclusion criteria for the retrieved documents.

resultsA total of 505 publications were retrieved through a search of the main data sources. The screenings and the ad hoc search led to a total of 56 publications to be used for the case study data extraction. In total, 87 repositioning and/or reformulation cases were found described in the literature, 23 of which presented different definitions and/or classifications by different authors.

conclusionGiven the disparity and inconsistency of terminologies and classifications in the literature, a harmonized nomenclature for drug repositioning, reformulation, and combination cases will allow for a robust analysis of the added value and market access conditions attributed for each strategy and case type as assessed by regulators and payors in Europe and the United States. After evaluation of the existing terminologies and given the absence of clear and consistent definitions for drug reformulation and repositioning in the literature, we propose a global terminology and taxonomy in order to cover all of the previously unclear definitions and classifications for repositioned and reformulated products.

Indexed as

classificationcombinationlifecycle managementmarket accessreformulationrepositioningrepurposingtaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID27226826
PMCPMC4865745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.