Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226768›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2016

Trichoderma reesei CRE1-mediated Carbon Catabolite Repression in Re-sponse to Sophorose Through RNA Sequencing Analysis.

Amanda Cristina Campos Antoniêto, Renato Graciano de Paula, Lílian Dos Santos Castro, Rafael Silva-Rocha, Gabriela Felix Persinoti, Roberto Nascimento Silva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Induction of cellulase production by SrBioresources and bioprocessing · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Molecular Characterization of XyloglucanaseInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda Cristina Campos AntoniêtoDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil;
Renato Graciano de PaulaDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil;
Lílian Dos Santos CastroDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil;
Rafael Silva-RochaDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology and Pathogenic Bioagents, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil;
Gabriela Felix PersinotiLaboratório Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia do Bioetanol (CTBE), Centro Nacional, de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberto Nascimento SilvaDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil;
Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon catabolite repression (CCR) mediated by CRE1 in Trichoderma reesei emerged as a mechanism by which the fungus could adapt to new environments. In the presence of readily available carbon sources such as glucose, the fungus activates this mechanism and inhibits the production of cellulolytic complex enzymes to avoid unnecessary energy expenditure. CCR has been well described for the growth of T. reesei in cellulose and glucose, however, little is known about this process when the carbon source is sophorose, one of the most potent inducers of cellulase production. Thus, we performed high-throughput RNA sequencing to better understand CCR during cellulase formation in the presence of sophorose, by comparing the mutant ∆cre1 with its parental strain, QM9414. Of the 9129 genes present in the genome of T. reesei, 184 were upregulated and 344 downregulated in the mutant strain ∆cre1 compared to QM9414. Genes belonging to the CAZy database, and those encoding transcription factors and transporters are among the gene classes that were repressed by CRE1 in the presence of sophorose; most were possible indirectly regulated by CRE1. We also observed that CRE1 activity is carbon-dependent. A recent study from our group showed that in cellulose, CRE1 repress different groups of genes when compared to sophorose. CCR differences between these carbon sources may be due to the release of cellodextrins in the cellulose polymer, resulting in different targets of CRE1 in both carbon sources. These results contribute to a better understanding of CRE1-mediated CCR in T. reesei when glucose comes from a potent inducer of cellulase production such as sophorose, which could prove useful in improving cellulase production by the biotechnology sector.

Indexed as

Carbon catabolite repressionCRE1RNA-seqSophoroseTrichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID27226768
PMCPMC4864841
OpenAlexW2465972551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.