Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226529›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

High Throughput Combinatorial Formatting of PcrV Nanobodies for Efficient Potency Improvement.

Evelyn De Tavernier, Laurent Detalle, Erika Morizzo, Annelies Roobrouck, Severine De Taeye, Melanie Rieger, Tom Verhaeghe, Andreia Correia, Rob Van Hegelsom, Rita Figueirido and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nanobodies: Robust miniprotein binders in biomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Single-domain antibodies pinpoint potential targets withinThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Evelyn De TavernierFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Laurent DetalleFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Erika MorizzoFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Annelies RoobrouckFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Severine De TaeyeFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Melanie RiegerFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Tom VerhaegheFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Andreia CorreiaFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Rob Van HegelsomFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Rita FigueiridoFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen NoensFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Søren SteffensenFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Thomas StöhrFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Willem Van de VeldeFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Erik DeplaFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Bruno DombrechtFrom Ablynx N.V., Technologiepark 21, 9052 Ghent, Belgium bruno.dombrecht@ablynx.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving potencies through concomitant blockage of multiple epitopes and avid binding by fusing multiple (different) monovalent Nanobody building blocks via linker sequences into one multivalent polypeptide chain is an elegant alternative to affinity maturation. We explored a large and random formatting library of bivalent (combinations of two identical) and biparatopic (combinations of two different) Nanobodies for functional blockade of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PcrV. PcrV is an essential part of the P. aeruginosa type III secretion system (T3SS), and its oligomeric nature allows for multiple complex binding and blocking options. The library screening yielded a large number of promising biparatopic lead candidates, revealing significant (and non-trivial) preferences in terms of Nanobody building block and epitope bin combinations and orientations. Excellent potencies were confirmed upon further characterization in two different P. aeruginosa T3SS-mediated cytotoxicity assays. Three biparatopic Nanobodies were evaluated in a lethal mouse P. aeruginosa challenge pneumonia model, conferring 100% survival upon prophylactic administration and reducing lung P. aeruginosa burden by up to 2 logs. At very low doses, they protected the mice from P. aeruginosa infection-related changes in lung histology, myeloperoxidase production, and lung weight. Importantly, the most potent Nanobody still conferred protection after therapeutic administration up to 24 h post-infection. The concept of screening such formatting libraries for potency improvement is applicable to other targets and biological therapeutic platforms.

Indexed as

Vaccine PotencyAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ToxinsCell DeathCombinatorial Chemistry TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalEpitope MappingEpitopesFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMice, Inbred C57BLModels, MolecularPneumoniaPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsAntigens, Bacterialantigen V, PseudomonasBacterial ToxinsEpitopesPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsSingle-Domain Antibodiesaviditybiparatopicbivalentepitope mappingformattinghigh throughput screening (HTS)PcrVPseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa)single-domain antibody (sdAb, Nanobody)type III secretion system (T3SS)

Identifiers

PMID27226529
PMCPMC4946937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.