Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226469›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Social life and sanitary risks: evolutionary and current ecological conditions determine waste management in leaf-cutting ants.

Alejandro G Farji-Brener, Luciana Elizalde, Hermógenes Fernández-Marín, Sabrina Amador-Vargas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low Virulence of the FungiFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The impact of the built environment on health behaviours and disease transmission in social systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  12. Architecture, space and information in constructions built by humans and social insects: a conceptual review.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alejandro G Farji-BrenerLaboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET, Pasaje Gutiérrez 1125, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina alefarji@yahoo.com.
Luciana ElizaldeLaboratorio Ecotono, INIBIOMA-CONICET, Pasaje Gutiérrez 1125, 8400 Bariloche, Argentina.
Hermógenes Fernández-MarínCentro de Biodiversidad y Descrubrimiento de Drogas, Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología, Cuidad del Saber, Panamá, Panama.ORCID 0000-0001-7200-384X
Sabrina Amador-VargasSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panamá, Panamá

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate waste management is vital for the success of social life, because waste accumulation increases sanitary risks in dense societies. We explored why different leaf-cutting ants (LCA) species locate their waste in internal nest chambers or external piles, including ecological context and accounting for phylogenetic relations. We propose that waste location depends on whether the environmental conditions enhance or reduce the risk of infection. We obtained the geographical range, habitat and refuse location of LCA from published literature, and experimentally determined whether pathogens on ant waste survived to the high soil temperatures typical of xeric habitats. The habitat of the LCA determined waste location after phylogenetic correction: species with external waste piles mainly occur in xeric environments, whereas those with internal waste chambers mainly inhabit more humid habitats. The ancestral reconstruction suggests that dumping waste externally is less derived than digging waste nest chambers. Empirical results showed that high soil surface temperatures reduce pathogen prevalence from LCA waste. We proposed that LCA living in environments unfavourable for pathogens (i.e. xeric habitats) avoid digging costs by dumping the refuse above ground. Conversely, in environments suitable for pathogens, LCA species prevent the spread of diseases by storing waste underground, presumably, a behaviour that contributed to the colonization of humid habitats. These results highlight the adaptation of organisms to the hygienic challenges of social living, and illustrate how sanitary behaviours can result from a combination of evolutionary history and current environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemSocial BehaviorAnimalsAntsHygieneSpecies SpecificityAcromyrmexant behaviourant wasteAttagroup livingwaste management

Identifiers

PMID27226469
PMCPMC4892804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.