Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226467›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Australian spiny mountain crayfish and their temnocephalan ectosymbionts: an ancient association on the edge of coextinction?

Jennifer F Hoyal Cuthill, Kim B Sewell, Lester R G Cannon, Michael A Charleston, Susan Lawler, D Timothy J Littlewood, Peter D Olson, David Blair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jennifer F Hoyal CuthillDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan jfh41@cam.ac.uk.
Kim B SewellCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis (CMM), The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Lester R G CannonQueensland Museum, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia.
Michael A CharlestonMathematics and Physics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Susan LawlerDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, La Trobe University, Wodonga, Victoria 3690, Australia.
D Timothy J LittlewoodDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
Peter D OlsonDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.
David BlairCollege of Marine and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia david.blair@jcu.edu.au.
Natural History Museum · GBJames Cook University · AULa Trobe University · AULife Science Institute · JPQueensland Museum · AUUniversity of Queensland · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Australian spiny mountain crayfish (Euastacus, Parastacidae) and their ecotosymbiotic temnocephalan flatworms (Temnocephalida, Platyhelminthes) may have co-occurred and interacted through deep time, during a period of major environmental change. Therefore, reconstructing the history of their association is of evolutionary, ecological, and conservation significance. Here, time-calibrated Bayesian phylogenies of Euastacus species and their temnocephalans (Temnohaswellia and Temnosewellia) indicate near-synchronous diversifications from the Cretaceous. Statistically significant cophylogeny correlations between associated clades suggest linked evolutionary histories. However, there is a stronger signal of codivergence and greater host specificity in Temnosewellia, which co-occurs with Euastacus across its range. Phylogeography and analyses of evolutionary distinctiveness (ED) suggest that regional differences in the impact of climate warming and drying had major effects both on crayfish and associated temnocephalans. In particular, Euastacus and Temnosewellia show strong latitudinal gradients in ED and, conversely, in geographical range size, with the most distinctive, northern lineages facing the greatest risk of extinction. Therefore, environmental change has, in some cases, strengthened ecological and evolutionary associations, leaving host-specific temnocephalans vulnerable to coextinction with endangered hosts. Consequently, the extinction of all Euastacus species currently endangered (75%) predicts coextinction of approximately 60% of the studied temnocephalans, with greatest loss of the most evolutionarily distinctive lineages.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsArthropod ProteinsAstacoideaAustraliaBayes TheoremDNAElectron Transport Complex IVPhylogenyPhylogeographySequence Analysis, DNATurbellariaArthropod ProteinsDNAElectron Transport Complex IVclimate changeconservationcophylogenyinvertebratesparasitesphylogeneticssymbionts

Identifiers

PMID27226467
PMCPMC4892802
OpenAlexW2397205263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.