Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226308›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Chloroplast FBPase and SBPase are thioredoxin-linked enzymes with similar architecture but different evolutionary histories.

Desirée D Gütle, Thomas Roret, Stefanie J Müller, Jérémy Couturier, Stéphane D Lemaire, Arnaud Hecker, Tiphaine Dhalleine, Bob B Buchanan, Ralf Reski, Oliver Einsle and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Desirée D GütlePlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Université de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany;
Thomas RoretUniversité de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France;
Stefanie J MüllerPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany;
Jérémy CouturierUniversité de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France;
Stéphane D LemaireSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Université Paris 6, CNRS UMR 8226, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire des Eucaryotes, Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, 75005 Paris, France;
Arnaud HeckerUniversité de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France;
Tiphaine DhalleineUniversité de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France;
Bob B BuchananDepartment of Plant & Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3102; j2p@univ-lorraine.fr view@berkeley.edu.
Ralf ReskiPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Centre for Biological Signalling Studies (BIOSS), 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), 79104 Freiburg, Germany;
Oliver EinsleSpemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Centre for Biological Signalling Studies (BIOSS), 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS), 79104 Freiburg, Germany; Institute for Biochemistry, University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Jean-Pierre JacquotUniversité de Lorraine, UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54500 Vandœuvre-les-Nancy, France; Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), UMR 1136 Interactions Arbres Microorganismes, F-54280 Champenoux, France; j2p@univ-lorraine.fr view@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4975-8587
Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes · FRUniversity of Freiburg · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Calvin-Benson cycle of carbon dioxide fixation in chloroplasts is controlled by light-dependent redox reactions that target specific enzymes. Of the regulatory members of the cycle, our knowledge of sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase) is particularly scanty, despite growing evidence for its importance and link to plant productivity. To help fill this gap, we have purified, crystallized, and characterized the recombinant form of the enzyme together with the better studied fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), in both cases from the moss Physcomitrella patens (Pp). Overall, the moss enzymes resembled their counterparts from seed plants, including oligomeric organization-PpSBPase is a dimer, and PpFBPase is a tetramer. The two phosphatases showed striking structural homology to each other, differing primarily in their solvent-exposed surface areas in a manner accounting for their specificity for seven-carbon (sedoheptulose) and six-carbon (fructose) sugar bisphosphate substrates. The two enzymes had a similar redox potential for their regulatory redox-active disulfides (-310 mV for PpSBPase vs. -290 mV for PpFBPase), requirement for Mg(2+) and thioredoxin (TRX) specificity (TRX f > TRX m). Previously known to differ in the position and sequence of their regulatory cysteines, the enzymes unexpectedly showed unique evolutionary histories. The FBPase gene originated in bacteria in conjunction with the endosymbiotic event giving rise to mitochondria, whereas SBPase arose from an archaeal gene resident in the eukaryotic host. These findings raise the question of how enzymes with such different evolutionary origins achieved structural similarity and adapted to control by the same light-dependent photosynthetic mechanism-namely ferredoxin, ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase, and thioredoxin.

Indexed as

BryopsidaChloroplast ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFructose-BisphosphatasePhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesThioredoxinsChloroplast ProteinsFructose-BisphosphatasePhosphoric Monoester Hydrolasessedoheptulose-bisphosphataseThioredoxinsCalvin–Benson cyclefructose-1,6-bisphosphataseredox regulationsedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatasethiol–disulfide exchange

Identifiers

PMID27226308
PMCPMC4914176
OpenAlexW2404477478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.