ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2016
Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis - evolution towards new treatment strategies.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Molecular imaging research in atherosclerosis: A 23-year scientometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Pooled it
- Overview of the RGD-Based PET Agents Use in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Platelet-derived biomimetic nanoplatforms: a promising drug delivery strategy for cardiovascular disease.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Exploratory Study of the Effects of Irreversible Electroporation on Atherosclerotic Plaque in a Rabbit Model.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Identification of diagnostic biomarkers and immune cell infiltration in coronary artery disease by machine learning, nomogram, and molecular docking.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a Consensus Statement from the Quantitative Cardiovascular Imaging Study Group.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2023Review
- Advances in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Activity with PET/CT and CTA.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Current advances in the imaging of atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque using nanoparticles.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- An Ex Vivo Study of Outward Electrical Impedance Tomography (OEIT) for Intravascular Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Let's embrace optical imaging: a growing branch on the clinical molecular imaging tree.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Efficacy of Resveratrol in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Hiding beyond plain sight: Textural analysis of positron emission tomography to identify high-risk plaques in carotid atherosclerosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Training and validation of a deep learning architecture for the automatic analysis of coronary angiography.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Article
- Consistency in Geometry Among Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques Extracted From Computed Tomography Angiography.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac computed tomography radiomics: an emerging tool for the non-invasive assessment of coronary atherosclerosis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Monitoring Endothelin-A Receptor Expression during the Progression of Atherosclerosis.Biomedicines · 2020Article
- Predictors of 18F-sodium fluoride uptake in patients with stable coronary artery disease and adverse plaque features on computed tomography angiography.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020Article
- In vivo alpha-V beta-3 integrin expression in human aortic atherosclerosis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2019Article
- A novel fluorescein-bisphosphonate based diagnostic tool for the detection of hydroxyapatite in both cell and tissue models.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Nanoparticle Functionalization with Platelet Membrane Enables Multifactored Biological Targeting and Detection of Atherosclerosis.ACS nano · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coronary atherosclerosis and the precipitation of acute myocardial infarction are highly complex processes, which makes accurate risk prediction challenging. Rapid developments in invasive and noninvasive imaging technologies now provide us with detailed, exquisite images of the coronary vasculature that allow direct investigation of a wide range of these processes. These modalities include sophisticated assessments of luminal stenoses and myocardial perfusion, complemented by novel measures of the atherosclerotic plaque burden, adverse plaque characteristics, and disease activity. Together, they can provide comprehensive, individualized assessments of coronary atherosclerosis as it occurs in patients. Not only can this information provide important pathological insights, but it can also potentially be used to guide personalized treatment decisions. In this Review, we describe the latest advances in both established and emerging imaging techniques, focusing on the strengths and weakness of each approach. Moreover, we discuss how these technological advances might be translated from attractive images into novel imaging strategies and definite improvements in clinical risk prediction and patient outcomes. This process will not be easy, and the many potential barriers and difficulties are also reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27226154What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.