Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27226141›Full record

ReviewMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2016

A review of disease progression models of Parkinson's disease and applications in clinical trials.

Charles S Venuto, Nicholas B Potter, E Ray Dorsey, Karl Kieburtz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Digital Phenotyping in Clinical Neurology.Seminars in neurology · 2022
    Article
  15. Re-Analysis of the STEADY-PD II Trial-Evidence for Slowing the Progression of Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2022
    Article
  16. Preventing Parkinson's Disease: An Environmental Agenda.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charles S Venuto *Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Nicholas B Potter *Center for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
E Ray DorseyCenter for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Karl KieburtzCenter for Human Experimental Therapeutics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

Developing, evaluating, and disseminating new methods and technologies to advance Parkinson disease researchP20NS092529 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI DORSEY, EARL RAY · 2015 to 2016
$767k
Quantitative Pharmacology for Accelerating Drug Development for HIV/HCV Co-Infected PatientsK23AI108355 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI VENUTO, CHARLES STANLEY · 2015 to 2019
$720k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI108355NINDS NIH HHS P20 NS092529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative disease progression models for neurodegenerative disorders are gaining recognition as important tools for drug development and evaluation. In Parkinson's disease (PD), several models have described longitudinal changes in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), one of the most utilized outcome measures for PD trials assessing disease progression. We conducted a literature review to examine the methods and applications of quantitative disease progression modeling for PD using a combination of key words including "Parkinson disease," "progression," and "model." For this review, we focused on models of PD progression quantifying changes in the total UPDRS scores against time. Four different models reporting equations and parameters have been published using linear and nonlinear functions. The reasons for constructing disease progression models of PD thus far have been to quantify disease trajectories of PD patients in active and inactive treatment arms of clinical trials, to quantify and discern symptomatic and disease-modifying treatment effects, and to demonstrate how model-based methods may be used to design clinical trials. The historical lack of efficiency of PD clinical trials begs for model-based simulations in planning for studies that result in more informative conclusions, particularly around disease modification. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionModels, TheoreticalParkinson DiseaseHumansdisease modeldisease progressionParkinson's diseasepharmacometricsUPDRS

Identifiers

PMID27226141
PMCPMC4931998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.