SynthesisMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2016
K-Ras mutation detection in liquid biopsy and tumor tissue as prognostic biomarker in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05400681 (Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pre- and Postoperative Incidence and Prognostic Implication of Positive Peritoneal Lavage and Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic indicator in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2019Pooled it
- The prognostic value of KRAS mutation by cell-free DNA in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- KRAS mutations in cell-free DNA from preoperative and postoperative sera as a pancreatic cancer marker: a retrospective study.British journal of cancer · 2018Trial
- Site-specific limitations of ctDNA in PDAC surveillance: imaging detects pulmonary and local recurrence missed by liquid biopsy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Peptides as integrative modulators for clinical prognosis and targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2026Article
- Surrogate Biomarkers in Gene Therapy for Orphan Diseases: Validation, Application, and Regulatory Aspects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prospective Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA Using Next-generation Sequencing as a Biomarker During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Localized Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgery · 2025Article
- Biomarkers: Promising and valuable tools towards diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of Covid-19 and other diseases.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic biomarker for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Genomic alteration profiles of lung cancer and their relationship to clinical features and prognosis value using individualized genetic testing.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Article
- Natural History of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosed During Observation of Other Organ Cancers.The American journal of case reports · 2019Article
- Differential uptake, kinetics and mechanisms of intracellular trafficking of next-generation antisense oligonucleotides across human cancer cell lines.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Circulating and disseminated tumor cells in pancreatic cancer and their role in patient prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Identifying and analyzing different cancer subtypes using RNA-seq data of blood platelets.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Performance of probe polymerization-conjunction-agarose gel electrophoresis in the rapid detection of KRAS gene mutation.Genetics and molecular biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
K-Ras gene mutations have been found in most pancreatic cancers; however, conflicting data on the prognostic value of K-Ras mutations in pancreatic cancer have been published. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess its prognostic significance. Literature searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Google Scholar were performed through December 2015 to identify publications exploring the association of K-Ras mutation with overall survival. Forty eligible studies involving 3427 patients with pancreatic cancer were included in the present meta-analysis. Our analysis showed a hazard ratio (HR) of negative association with survival of 1.61 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.36-1.90; p < 0.01] in K-Ras mutant pancreatic cancer patients. In subgroup analyses, K-Ras mutations detected in tumor tissues and in liquid biopsies had HRs of 1.37 (95 % CI 1.20-1.57; p < 0.01) and 3.16 (95 % CI 2.1-4.71; p < 0.01), respectively. In addition, the HR was higher when K-Ras mutations were detected in fresh frozen samples (HR = 2.01, 95 % CI 1.28-3.16, p = 0.002) than in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples (HR = 1.29, 95 % CI 1.12-1.49, p < 0.01). Though K-Ras alterations are more frequent among non-East Asian individuals than East Asian individuals, there were no significant differences in HRs of survival between the two ethnic subgroups. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that K-Ras mutations are associated with a worse overall survival in pancreatic cancer patients, especially when mutations are detected in liquid biopsies or fresh frozen tumor tissue samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.