Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225761›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Catecholamine-Mediated Increases in Gain Enhance the Precision of Cortical Representations.

Christopher M Warren, Eran Eldar, Ruud L van den Brink, Klodianna-Daphne Tona, Nic J van der Wee, Eric J Giltay, Martijn S van Noorden, Jos A Bosch, Robert C Wilson, Jonathan D Cohen and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  4. Distinct Roles of Dopamine and Noradrenaline in Incidental Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Trial
  5. Regulation of the decision threshold by the locus coeruleus.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pupil-Linked Arousal Modulates Precision of Stimulus Representation in Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Fluid intelligence and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Christopher M WarrenDepartment of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands, c.m.warren@fsw.leidenuniv.nl.
Eran EldarWelcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Ruud L van den BrinkDepartment of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Klodianna-Daphne TonaDepartment of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nic J van der WeeLeiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands, Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eric J GiltayDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8874-2292
Martijn S van NoordenDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos A BoschDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Robert C WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, and.
Jonathan D CohenDepartment of Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, The Netherlands, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sander NieuwenhuisDepartment of Psychology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Mannheim · DEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

NRSA Training Grant in Quantitative NeuroscienceT32MH065214 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Nathaniel Douglass Daw, KENNETH A NORMAN · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledNeurophysiological evidence suggests that neuromodulators, such as norepinephrine and dopamine, increase neural gain in target brain areas. Computational models and prominent theoretical frameworks indicate that this should enhance the precision of neural representations, but direct empirical evidence for this hypothesis is lacking. In two functional MRI studies, we examine the effect of baseline catecholamine levels (as indexed by pupil diameter and manipulated pharmacologically) on the precision of object representations in the human ventral temporal cortex using angular dispersion, a powerful, multivariate metric of representational similarity (precision). We first report the results of computational model simulations indicating that increasing catecholaminergic gain should reduce the angular dispersion, and thus increase the precision, of object representations from the same category, as well as reduce the angular dispersion of object representations from distinct categories when distinct-category representations overlap. In Study 1 (N = 24), we show that angular dispersion covaries with pupil diameter, an index of baseline catecholamine levels. In Study 2 (N = 24), we manipulate catecholamine levels and neural gain using the norepinephrine transporter blocker atomoxetine and demonstrate consistent, causal effects on angular dispersion and brain-wide functional connectivity. Despite the use of very different methods of examining the effect of baseline catecholamine levels, our results show a striking convergence and demonstrate that catecholamines increase the precision of neural representations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Norepinephrine and dopamine are among the most widely distributed and ubiquitous neuromodulators in the mammalian brain and have a profound and pervasive impact on cognition. Baseline catecholamine levels tend to increase with increasing task engagement in tasks involving perceptual decisions, yet there is currently no direct evidence of the specific impact of these increases in catecholamine levels on perceptual encoding. Our results fill this void by showing that catecholamines enhance the precision of encoding cortical object representations, and by suggesting that this effect is mediated by increases in neural gain, thus offering a mechanistic account of our key finding.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultBrain MappingCatecholaminesComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMemoryNerve NetNeurotransmitter AgentsPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyTask Performance and AnalysisTemporal LobeVisual CortexCatecholaminesNeurotransmitter AgentscatecholaminedopaminefMRInorepinephrineperceptionpsychopharmacology

Identifiers

PMID27225761
PMCPMC6601838
OpenAlexW2394621638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.