Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225711›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2016

Efficacy of vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) after radical prostatectomy: the initial Irish experience of a dedicated VED clinic.

G J Nason, F McNamara, M Twyford, F O'Kelly, S White, E Dunne, G C Durkan, S K Giri, G P Smyth, R E Power

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G J NasonDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F McNamaraDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
M TwyfordDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
F O'KellyDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
S WhiteDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
E DunneDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
G C DurkanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
S K GiriDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
G P SmythDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
R E PowerDepartment of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Beaumont Hospital · IEUniversity Hospital Limerick · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding optimal penile rehabilitation program following radical prostatectomy (RP). Vacuum erectile devices (VEDs) have become an important component of penile rehabilitation protocols. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and patient satisfaction of a dedicated VED clinic. A voluntary telephone questionnaire was performed of all patients who attended a VED clinic to date in two university teaching hospitals. Patient demographics, histopathological characteristics and functional status (International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores) were obtained from a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Sixty-five men attended the dedicated VED clinic in the two university teaching hospitals. Forty-men (76.3%) men purchased a VED following the dedicated clinic. There was significant differences noted between the mean preoperative and the 3-month postoperative IIEF scores (22.08±3.16 vs 11.3±3.08, P=0.0001) and between the 3-month postoperative IIEF score and the post-VED use IIEF score (11.3±3.08 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). Despite VED use, there was a significant reduction in erectile function from presurgery status (22.08±3.16 vs 16.74±2.62, P=0.0001). All patients reported that the dedicated VED was helpful and would recommend it to other patients. Our study demonstrates that, despite a reduction in erectile function after RP, successful erections are attainable with a VED. There is potential and need for the development of a standard penile rehabilitation program and treatment of ED after RP internationally.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPenile ErectionPostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVacuum

Identifiers

PMID27225711
OpenAlexW2408129236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.