ArticlePhysiological reports2016
Effect of adrenergic agonists on coronary blood flow: a laboratory study in healthy volunteers.
Article in Physiological reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beta-1 vs. beta-2 adrenergic control of coronary blood flow during isometric handgrip exercise in humans.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017Trial
- Esmolol infusion versus propranolol infusion: effects on heart rate and blood pressure in healthy volunteers.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017Trial
- βBMJ case reports · 2026Article
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Ischaemic Heart Disease: Lessons From Large Animal Models.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Review
- The βAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- Vasopressor-Induced Generalized Coronary Vasospasm Presenting as Inferior ST-Segment Elevation in Post-Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.JACC. Case reports · 2019Article
- Are Vasopressors an Enemy of the Coronary Arteries?JACC. Case reports · 2019Article
- Article
- Influence of increased heart rate and aortic pressure on resting indices of functional coronary stenosis severity.Basic research in cardiology · 2017Article
- Effect of adrenergic agonists on coronary blood flow: a laboratory study in healthy volunteers.Physiological reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial oxygen supply and demand mismatch is fundamental to the pathophysiology of ischemia and infarction. The sympathetic nervous system, through α-adrenergic receptors and β-adrenergic receptors, influences both myocardial oxygen supply and demand. In animal models, mechanistic studies have established that adrenergic receptors contribute to coronary vascular tone. The purpose of this laboratory study was to noninvasively quantify coronary responses to adrenergic receptor stimulation in humans. Fourteen healthy volunteers (11 men and 3 women) performed isometric handgrip exercise to fatigue followed by intravenous infusion of isoproterenol. A subset of individuals also received infusions of phenylephrine (n = 6), terbutaline (n = 10), and epinephrine (n = 4); all dosages were based on fat-free mass and were infused slowly to achieve steady-state. The left anterior descending coronary artery was visualized using Doppler echocardiography. Beat-by-beat heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), peak diastolic coronary velocity (CBVpeak), and coronary velocity time integral were calculated. Data are presented as M ± SD Isometric handgrip elicited significant increases in BP, HR, and CBVpeak (from 23.3 ± 5.3 to 34.5 ± 9.9 cm/sec). Isoproterenol raised HR and CBVpeak (from 22.6 ± 4.8 to 43.9 ± 12.4 cm/sec). Terbutaline and epinephrine evoked coronary hyperemia whereas phenylephrine did not significantly alter CBVpeak. Different indices of coronary hyperemia (changes in CBVpeak and velocity time integral) were significantly correlated (R = 0.803). The current data indicate that coronary hyperemia occurs in healthy humans in response to isometric handgrip exercise and low-dose, steady-state infusions of isoproterenol, terbutaline, and epinephrine. The contribution of β1 versus β2 receptors to coronary hyperemia remains to be determined. In this echocardiographic study, we demonstrate that coronary blood flow increases when β-adrenergic receptors are stimulated (i.e., during exercise and different intravenous infusions). Our infusion paradigms and beat-by-beat imaging methodologies can be used in future studies to evaluate age-, sex-, and disease- differences in adrenergic control of coronary blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.