Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225596›Full record

Trial reportObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2016

Randomized clinical trial of portion-controlled prepackaged foods to promote weight loss.

Cheryl L Rock, Shirley W Flatt, Bilgé Pakiz, Hava-Shoshana Barkai, Dennis D Heath, Kim C Krumhar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheryl L RockDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, California, USA.
Shirley W FlattDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, California, USA.
Bilgé PakizDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, California, USA.
Hava-Shoshana BarkaiDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, California, USA.
Dennis D HeathDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, California, USA.
Kim C KrumharScience and Technology Group, Nestlé Product Technology Centre, Solon, Ohio, USA.
University of California, San Diego · USUC San Diego Health System · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Jing Yang · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProviding portion-controlled prepackaged foods in a behavioral counseling intervention may promote more weight and fat loss than a standard self-selected diet.

methodsThe primary aim was to test whether providing portion-controlled prepackaged lunch and dinner entrées within a behavioral weight loss intervention promotes greater weight loss at 12 weeks compared to self-selected foods in adults with overweight/obesity. Other aims were to examine effects on biological factors, fitness, and meal satisfaction. One-half of those assigned to prepackaged entrées were provided items with a higher protein level (>25% energy) as an exploratory aim.

resultsParticipants (N = 183) had a baseline weight of 95.9 (15.6) kg (mean [SD]) and BMI of 33.2 (3.5) kg/m(2) . Weight data at 12 weeks were available for 180 subjects. Weight loss for regular entrée, higher protein entrée, and control groups was 8.6 (3.9)%, 7.8 (5.1)%, and 6.0 (4.4)%, respectively (P < 0.05, intervention vs. control). Intervention participants lost more body fat than controls (5.7 [3.4] vs. 4.4 [3.3] kg, P < 0.05).

conclusionsA meal plan incorporating portion-controlled prepackaged entrées promotes greater weight and fat loss than a standard self-selected diet, with comparable meal satisfaction. Initial weight loss predicts long-term weight loss so these results are relevant to likelihood of longer term success.

Indexed as

FoodNutritive ValueAdultDiet, ReducingEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPatient ComplianceTreatment OutcomeWeight LossYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27225596
PMCPMC5312668
OpenAlexW2399051841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.