ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017
Optimization of a simultaneous dual-isotope
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- The neuronal imaging in cardiology: 123I-Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Establishment of aAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of appropriate therapies delivered by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with coronary artery disease during long-term period.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Prediction of appropriate ICD therapy in patients with ischemic heart failure.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Multi-peak multi-isotopes myocardial SPECT: It's easier said than done.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Simultaneous dual isotopeJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Dual-isotope cardiac SPECT: the Twin Peaks Saga in nuclear cardiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- First assessment of simultaneous dual isotope (Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018Article
- Imaging the heart's brain: Simultaneous innervation/perfusion analysis in the era of new CZT cameras.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- Dual isotope and multidetector camera: The best choices for a specific end-point.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Article
- Current Clinical Applications and Next Steps for Cardiac Innervation Imaging.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Novel SPECT Technologies and Approaches in Cardiac Imaging.Cardiovascular innovations and applications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDual-isotope
methodsSixty-nine patients were prospectively enrolled after revascularization to undergo
resultsSummed rest scores (SRS) were significantly higher in the delayed MIBG studies than the early MIBG studies. SRS and necrosis surface were significantly higher in the delayed thallium studies with scatter correction than without scatter correction, leading to less trigger zone diagnosis for the scatter-corrected studies. Compared with the scatter-uncorrected studies, the late thallium scatter-corrected studies provided the best diagnostic values for myocardial necrosis assessment.
conclusionsDelayed acquisitions and scatter-corrected dual-isotope
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.