Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225514›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2017

Development and validation of a phase analysis tool to measure interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gated SPECT MPI.

Weihua Zhou, Zhixin Jiang, Ji Chen, Ernest V Garcia, Dianfu Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanical dyssynchrony & CRT: Is it time for guideline updates?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Prognostic value of phase analysis on gated single photon emission computed tomography in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Detection of interventricular dyssynchrony: An evolution of the phase analysis technique.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Weihua ZhouSchool of Computing, University of Southern Mississippi, Long Beach, MS, USA.
Zhixin JiangDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Ji ChenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ernest V GarciaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dianfu LiDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. doctorldf@163.com.
Emory University · USJiangsu Province Hospital · CNNanjing Medical University · CNUniversity of Southern Mississippi · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 15POST22690035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe purpose of this study is to develop a right-ventricular (RV) phase analysis tool which when coupled with our left ventricular (LV) phase analysis tool can provide measurement of the interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony from gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and validate the tool by electrocardiography (ECG).

methodsFor each patient, short-axis LV and RV SPECT MPI images were input into an automatic sampling algorithm to generate the 3D maximal count circumferential profiles for both LV and RV in each cardiac frame. Subsequently, the samples of LV and RV were separately used by our phase analysis tool based on the first-harmonic Fourier approximation to calculate the contraction onset for each sample. The difference between contraction onsets of the middle LV free wall and middle LV septal wall represented the LV contraction delay; the difference between contraction onsets of the middle RV free wall and middle RV septal wall represented the RV contraction delay. The difference between the LV and RV contraction delays represented the interventricular contraction delay, which was compared with the interventricular conduction delay classified by ECG to validate the concordance of interventricular mechanical and electrical dyssynchrony. Sixty-one bundle branch block (BBB) patients with ischemic-dilated cardiomyopathy (26, 42.6%) or non-ischemic-dilated cardiomyopathy (35, 57.4%), who underwent 12-lead surface ECG and gated resting Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT, were retrospectively analyzed in this study.

resultsIn the 30 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) by ECG, there were 27 patients whose LV contracted later than the RV according to SPECT; and in the 31 patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) by ECG, there were 26 patients whose LV contracted earlier than the RV according to SPECT. In total, an agreement rate of 86.9% (53 of 61) was achieved between SPECT and ECG. The Kappa agreement rate was 73.8% (95% confidence interval 0.57-0.91).

conclusionThe preliminary results showed promise for the measurement of interventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in BBB patients with dilated cardiomyopathy using our phase analysis tool.

Indexed as

Myocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAlgorithmsBundle-Branch BlockElectrocardiographyFemaleHeartHeart VentriclesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiECGinterventricular dyssynchronymyocardial perfusion imagingphase analysisSPECT

Identifiers

PMID27225514
PMCPMC10955150
OpenAlexW2404570658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.