Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225409›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Use of a Rapid Test for Diagnosis of Dengue during Suspected Dengue Outbreaks in Resource-Limited Regions.

Elizabeth A Hunsperger, Tyler M Sharp, Paul Lalita, Kini Tikomaidraubuta, Yolanda Rebello Cardoso, Taina Naivalu, Aalisha Sahu Khan, Maria Marfel, W Thane Hancock, Kay M Tomashek and 1 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A review of dengue diagnostics and implications for surveillance and control.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elizabeth A HunspergerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA Enh4@cdc.gov.
Tyler M SharpCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Paul LalitaRepublic of Marshall Islands Ministry of Health, Majuro, Marshall Islands.
Kini TikomaidraubutaRepublic of Marshall Islands Ministry of Health, Majuro, Marshall Islands.
Yolanda Rebello CardosoNational Institute of Public Health, Luanda, Angola.
Taina NaivaluFiji Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Suva, Fiji.
Aalisha Sahu KhanFiji Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Suva, Fiji.
Maria MarfelFederated States of Micronesia, Yap.
W Thane HancockFederated States of Micronesia, Yap.
Kay M TomashekCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Harold S MargolisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is major public health problem, globally. Timely verification of suspected dengue outbreaks allows for public health response, leading to the initiation of appropriate clinical care. Because the clinical presentation of dengue is nonspecific, dengue diagnosis would benefit from a sensitive rapid diagnostic test (RDT). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of an RDT that detects dengue virus (DENV) nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) and anti-DENV IgM during suspected acute febrile illness (AFI) outbreaks in four countries. Real-time reverse transcription-PCR and anti-DENV IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to verify RDT results. Anti-DENV IgM RDT sensitivity and specificity ranged from 55.3 to 91.7% and 85.3 to 98.5%, respectively, and NS1 sensitivity and specificity ranged from 49.7 to 92.9% and 22.2 to 89.0%, respectively. Sensitivity varied by timing of specimen collection and DENV serotype. Combined test results moderately improved the sensitivity. The use of RDTs identified dengue as the cause of AFI outbreaks where reference diagnostic testing was limited or unavailable.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralChildChild, PreschoolDengueDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin MInfantInfant, NewbornAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin MViral Nonstructural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27225409
PMCPMC4963516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.