Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225388›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2016

Lymphovascular invasion is an independent predictor of survival in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Ying L Liu, Anurag Saraf, Shing M Lee, Xiaobo Zhong, Hanina Hibshoosh, Kevin Kalinsky, Eileen P Connolly

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic spectra of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying L LiuDepartment of Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anurag SarafDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shing M LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Xiaobo ZhongDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Hanina HibshooshDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin KalinskyDepartment of Medical Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eileen P ConnollyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. epc2116@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR000081 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GINSBERG, HENRY N · 2012 to 2015
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various prognostic indicators have been investigated in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)-treated invasive breast cancer (BC). Our study examines if lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an independent predictor of survival in women receiving NAC. We performed a retrospective analysis in 166 women with operable invasive BC who underwent adriamycin- and taxane-based NAC between 2000 and 2013. The presence of LVI was noted in breast excisions following NAC. Associations between progression-free and overall survival and LVI and other clinicopathologic variables were assessed. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 1.4-153 months) with a total of 56 events and 24 deaths from any cause. LVI was found in 74 of 166 patients (45 %). In univariate analysis, the presence of LVI was associated with worse progression-free survival (HR 3.37, 95 % CI 1.87-6.06, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 4.35, 95 % CI 1.61-11.79, p < 0.01). In multivariate models adjusting for breast cancer subtype, LVI was significantly associated with a decrease in progression-free survival (HR 3.76, 95 % CI 2.07-6.83, p < 0.01) and overall survival (HR 5.70, 95 % CI 2.08-15.64, p < 0.01). When stratified by subtype, those with hormone receptor or HER2-positive BCs with no LVI had the most favorable progression-free and overall survival. Those with both LVI and triple-negative BC had the worst progression-free and overall survival. LVI is an important prognostic marker and is associated with worse clinical outcome in breast cancer patients receiving NAC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalDoxorubicinFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTaxoidsAntineoplastic AgentsBridged-Ring CompoundsDoxorubicintaxaneTaxoidsBreast cancerLymphovascular invasionNeoadjuvant chemotherapySurvival

Identifiers

PMID27225388
PMCPMC5337480
OpenAlexW2399644569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.