Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225217›Full record

Trial reportHealth promotion practice2016

Qualitative Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Culturally Tailored Lifestyle Intervention for Underserved South Asians.

Manasi Jayaprakash, Ankita Puri-Taneja, Namratha R Kandula, Himali Bharucha, Santosh Kumar, Swapna S Dave

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health promotion practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coproducing COVID-19 Health Information Resources: A Participatory Study With Older Adults From Minoritised Ethnic Communities in the UK.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manasi JayaprakashRollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ankita Puri-TanejaNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Namratha R KandulaNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA nkandula@nm.org.
Himali BharuchaMetropolitan Asian Family Services, Chicago, IL, USA.
Santosh KumarMetropolitan Asian Family Services, Chicago, IL, USA.
Swapna S DaveNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Northwestern University · USMetropolitan Asian Family Services · USGeorgia Department of Public Health · US

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002318 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Megan Moore · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesTL1TR000422 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
Real Time Analysis of Diet and Activity DataK07CA154862 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SIDDIQUE, JUNED · 2011 to 2015
$585k
Translating a Heart Disease Lifestyle Intervention into the CommunityR21HL113743 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KANDULA, NAMRATHA R · 2012 to 2013
$402k
Community-Clinic Partnership to Promote Physical Activity in South Asian WomenR56DK099680 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KANDULA, NAMRATHA R · 2014 to 2014
$190k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000422NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002318NCI NIH HHS K07 CA154862NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL113743NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK099680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction There are few examples of effective cardiovascular disease prevention interventions for South Asians (SAs). We describe the results of a process evaluation of the South Asian Heart Lifestyle Intervention for medically underserved SAs implemented at a community-based organization (CBO) using community-based participatory research methods and a randomized control design (n = 63). Method Interviews were conducted with 23 intervention participants and 5 study staff using a semistructured interview guide focused on participant and staff perceptions about the intervention's feasibility and efficacy. Data were thematically analyzed. Results Intervention success was attributed to trusted CBO setting, culturally concordant study staff, and culturally tailored experiential activities. Participants said that these activities helped increase knowledge and behavior change. Some participants, especially men, found that self-monitoring with pedometers helped motivate increased physical activity. Participants said that the intervention could be strengthened by greater family involvement and by providing women-only exercise classes. Staff identified the need to reduce participant burden due to multicomponent intervention and agreed that the CBO needed greater financial resources to address participant barriers. Conclusion Community-based delivery and cultural adaptation of an evidence-based lifestyle intervention were effective and essential components for reaching and retaining medically underserved SAs in a cardiovascular disease prevention intervention study.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyExerciseHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLife StyleAccelerometryAdultAsianAsia, WesternCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity Health ServicesDietFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMalecardiovascular diseasecommunity-based interventioncommunity-based participatory researchprocess evaluationqualitative evaluationSouth Asian

Identifiers

PMID27225217
PMCPMC6203316
OpenAlexW2405166139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.