Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27225022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Transcriptome analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae treated with the designed antimicrobial peptides, DM3.

Cheng-Foh Le, Ranganath Gudimella, Rozaimi Razali, Rishya Manikam, Shamala Devi Sekaran

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Biocontrol and Action Mechanism ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Antimicrobial Peptides: An Update on Classifications and Databases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Effects of Peptide CFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Foh LeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ranganath GudimellaSengenics Sdn Bhd, High Impact Research Building, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rozaimi RazaliSengenics Sdn Bhd, High Impact Research Building, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rishya ManikamDepartment of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, University Malaya Medical Centre, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Shamala Devi SekaranDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our previous studies, we generated a short 13 amino acid antimicrobial peptide (AMP), DM3, showing potent antipneumococcal activity in vitro and in vivo. Here we analyse the underlying mechanisms of action using Next-Generation transcriptome sequencing of penicillin (PEN)-resistant and PEN-susceptible pneumococci treated with DM3, PEN, and combination of DM3 and PEN (DM3PEN). DM3 induced differential expression in cell wall and cell membrane structural and transmembrane processes. Notably, DM3 altered the expression of competence-induction pathways by upregulating CelA, CelB, and CglA while downregulating Ccs16, ComF, and Ccs4 proteins. Capsular polysaccharide subunits were downregulated in DM3-treated cells, however, it was upregulated in PEN- and DM3PEN-treated groups. Additionally, DM3 altered the amino acids biosynthesis pathways, particularly targeting ribosomal rRNA subunits. Downregulation of cationic AMPs resistance pathway suggests that DM3 treatment could autoenhance pneumococci susceptibility to DM3. Gene enrichment analysis showed that unlike PEN and DM3PEN, DM3 treatment exerted no effect on DNA-binding RNA polymerase activity but observed downregulation of RpoD and RNA polymerase sigma factor. In contrast to DM3, DM3PEN altered the regulation of multiple purine/pyrimidine biosynthesis and metabolic pathways. Future studies based on in vitro experiments are proposed to investigate the key pathways leading to pneumococcal cell death caused by DM3.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacterial ProteinsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene OntologyGenes, BacterialPenicillin ResistancePenicillinsRNA, BacterialRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNAStreptococcus pneumoniaeTranscriptomeAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacterial ProteinsPenicillinsRNA, BacterialRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27225022
PMCPMC4881017
OpenAlexW2401557587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.