ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
PredictSNP2: A Unified Platform for Accurately Evaluating SNP Effects by Exploiting the Different Characteristics of Variants in Distinct Genomic Regions.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
120 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 198 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Genomic editing of metformin efficacy-associated genetic variants in SLC47A1 does not alter SLC47A1 expression.Human molecular genetics · 2022Pooled it
- Comprehensive functional network analysis and screening of deleterious pathogenic variants in non-syndromic hearing loss causative genes.Bioscience reports · 2021Pooled it
- A Chinese infant with CACNA1C p.C1021R variant expands clinical phenotype of CACNA1C-related disorder.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Integrated mapping resolves pathogenicity of 11Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
- CDsyn: A comprehensive database for deleterious human synonymous variation prediction.iScience · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of CLCN5 Missense Mutations in Dent Disease Type 1: A Comprehensive Computational Analysis and Clinical Correlations in a Chinese Cohort.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Functional characterization of a multi-cancer risk locus on chromosome band 2q33.1 nearbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based analysis of drug resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Rare and novel genetic variants in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease: insights from the first Saudi cohort.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- A bioinformatics pipeline for identifying clinically relevant immune and adhesion biomarkers in thyroid risk stratification.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Enhanced computational strategies for categorizing HER2 kinase domain variants of uncertain significance through structural and functional analysis.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Peripheral Macular Endothelial Dystrophy: Clinical, Histopathologic, Genetic and Functional Characterization.American journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Predictive Analysis and Validation of Critical Missense SNPs of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Investigating the Structural and Functional Consequences of Pathogenic SNPs on Human VEGFA Dimer: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Study.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Functional synonymous mutations and their evolutionary consequences.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- A de novo FBN1 variant likely causes congenital bilateral ectopia lentis in a crossbred horse.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DRP-PSM: Multi-Level Feature Integration Reveals Hierarchical Contributions to Pathogenic Synonymous Mutation Prediction.ACS omega · 2025Article
- A Novel Jak1 Gene Mutation in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Genetic variants in the CD59 gene: An exploratory study of large genome databases.Transfusion · 2025Article
60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important message taken from human genome sequencing projects is that the human population exhibits approximately 99.9% genetic similarity. Variations in the remaining parts of the genome determine our identity, trace our history and reveal our heritage. The precise delineation of phenotypically causal variants plays a key role in providing accurate personalized diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of inherited diseases. Several computational methods for achieving such delineation have been reported recently. However, their ability to pinpoint potentially deleterious variants is limited by the fact that their mechanisms of prediction do not account for the existence of different categories of variants. Consequently, their output is biased towards the variant categories that are most strongly represented in the variant databases. Moreover, most such methods provide numeric scores but not binary predictions of the deleteriousness of variants or confidence scores that would be more easily understood by users. We have constructed three datasets covering different types of disease-related variants, which were divided across five categories: (i) regulatory, (ii) splicing, (iii) missense, (iv) synonymous, and (v) nonsense variants. These datasets were used to develop category-optimal decision thresholds and to evaluate six tools for variant prioritization: CADD, DANN, FATHMM, FitCons, FunSeq2 and GWAVA. This evaluation revealed some important advantages of the category-based approach. The results obtained with the five best-performing tools were then combined into a consensus score. Additional comparative analyses showed that in the case of missense variations, protein-based predictors perform better than DNA sequence-based predictors. A user-friendly web interface was developed that provides easy access to the five tools' predictions, and their consensus scores, in a user-understandable format tailored to the specific features of different categories of variations. To enable comprehensive evaluation of variants, the predictions are complemented with annotations from eight databases. The web server is freely available to the community at http://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/predictsnp2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.