ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2016
Functionalized anatomical models for EM-neuron Interaction modeling.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electromagnetic and Electrophysiological Modeling of Cardiac Stimulation Thresholds in 13 MRI Gradient Systems and 56 Body Models.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- In situ electric field dosimetry analysis for powerline frequency peripheral nerve magnetic stimulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Computational insights into magnetoelectric nanoparticles for neural stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Experimental validation of a PNS-optimized whole-body gradient coil.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- A Huygens' surface approach to rapid characterization of peripheral nerve stimulation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- MorphoSONIC: A morphologically structured intramembrane cavitation model reveals fiber-specific neuromodulation by ultrasound.iScience · 2021Article
- Optimization of MRI Gradient Coils With Explicit Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Constraints.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Optimizing selective stimulation of peripheral nerves with arrays of coils or surface electrodes using a linear peripheral nerve stimulation metric.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2019Article
- Prediction of peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds of MRI gradient coils using coupled electromagnetic and neurodynamic simulations.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Current Directions in the Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation II - An Engineering Perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Functionalized Anatomical Models for Computational Life Sciences.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
- Numerical modeling of percutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a realistic 3D model to evaluate sensitivity of neural activation to electrode position.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2017Article
- Predicting Magnetostimulation Thresholds in the Peripheral Nervous System using Realistic Body Models.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Investigation of assumptions underlying current safety guidelines on EM-induced nerve stimulation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The understanding of interactions between electromagnetic (EM) fields and nerves are crucial in contexts ranging from therapeutic neurostimulation to low frequency EM exposure safety. To properly consider the impact of in vivo induced field inhomogeneity on non-linear neuronal dynamics, coupled EM-neuronal dynamics modeling is required. For that purpose, novel functionalized computable human phantoms have been developed. Their implementation and the systematic verification of the integrated anisotropic quasi-static EM solver and neuronal dynamics modeling functionality, based on the method of manufactured solutions and numerical reference data, is described. Electric and magnetic stimulation of the ulnar and sciatic nerve were modeled to help understanding a range of controversial issues related to the magnitude and optimal determination of strength-duration (SD) time constants. The results indicate the importance of considering the stimulation-specific inhomogeneous field distributions (especially at tissue interfaces), realistic models of non-linear neuronal dynamics, very short pulses, and suitable SD extrapolation models. These results and the functionalized computable phantom will influence and support the development of safe and effective neuroprosthetic devices and novel electroceuticals. Furthermore they will assist the evaluation of existing low frequency exposure standards for the entire population under all exposure conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.