Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27224469›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Efficacy of Short-Term Antiarrhythmic Drugs Use after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation-A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequential Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Weijie Chen, Hang Liu, Zhiyu Ling, Yanping Xu, Jinqi Fan, Huaan Du, Peilin Xiao, Li Su, Zengzhang Liu, Xianbin Lan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of dronedarone and amiodarone for preventing recurrence after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: an open-label randomized controlled trial.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Selected Advances in the Anti-arrhythmic Management of Atrial Fibrillation: 2023.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Knots to untie: anticoagulant and antiarrhythmic therapy after ablation for atrial fibrillation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Weijie ChenDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhiyu LingDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yanping XuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jinqi FanDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Huaan DuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Peilin XiaoDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Li SuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zengzhang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xianbin LanDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Bernhard ZrennerMedizinischeKlinik I (B.Z.), Krankenhaus Landshut/Achdorf, Landshut, Germany.
Yuehui YinDepartment of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chongqing Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNDalian Medical University · CNUniversity of Applied Sciences Landshut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of short-term antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) use compared with no-AADs prescription after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrence is uncertain.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through December 2015 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which evaluated the efficacy of short-term AADs use compared with no-AADs prescription after AF ablation in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The primary outcome was labeled as early atrial arrhythmia recurrence within 3 months after ablation. Secondary outcome was defined as late recurrence after 3 months of ablation. Random-effects model or fixed-effects model was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsSix RCTs with 2,667 patients were included into this meta-analysis. Compared with no-AADs administration after AF ablation, short-term AADs use was associated with significant reduction of early atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.87; p = 0.003). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) showed that the cumulative Z-curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, establishing sufficient and conclusive evidence. However, compared with no-AADs prescription, short-term AADs use after AF ablation didn't significantly reduce the risk of late atrial arrhythmia recurrence (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.03; p = 0.15). TSA supported this result; meanwhile the estimated required information size (1,486 patients) was also met.

conclusionShort-term use of AADs after AF ablation can significantly decrease the risk of early atrial arrhythmia recurrence but not lead to corresponding reduction in risk of late atrial arrhythmia recurrence.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk FactorsAnti-Arrhythmia Agents

Identifiers

PMID27224469
PMCPMC4880320
OpenAlexW2402740492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.