Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27223616›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Zebras and Biting Flies: Quantitative Analysis of Reflected Light from Zebra Coats in Their Natural Habitat.

Kenneth H Britten, Timothy D Thatcher, Tim Caro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Zebra stripes: the questions raised by the answers.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Why don't horseflies land on zebras?The Journal of experimental biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Zebra stripes, tabanid biting flies and the aperture effect.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenneth H BrittenDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Timothy D ThatcherDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.
Tim CaroDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, United States of America.

Funding

The Role of Extrastriate and Parietal Cortex in the Control of SteeringR01EY022087 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BRITTEN, KENNETH H · 2013 to 2017
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and comparative evidence suggests that the striped coats of zebras deter biting fly attack, but the mechanisms by which flies fail to target black-and-white mammals are still opaque. Two hypotheses have been proposed: stripes might serve either to defeat polarotaxis or to obscure the form of the animal. To test these hypotheses, we systematically photographed free-living plains zebras in Africa. We found that black and white stripes both have moderate polarization signatures with a similar angle, though the degree (magnitude) of polarization in white stripes is lower. When we modeled the visibility of these signals from different distances, we found that polarization differences between stripes are invisible to flies more than 10 m away because they are averaged out by the flies' low visual resolution. At any distance, however, a positively polarotactic insect would have a distinct signal to guide its visual approach to a zebra because we found that polarization of light reflecting from zebras is higher than from surrounding dry grasses. We also found that the stripes themselves are visible to flies at somewhat greater distances (up to 20 m) than the polarization contrast between stripes. Together, these observations support hypotheses in which zebra stripes defeat visually guided orienting behavior in flies by a mechanism independent of polarotaxis.

Indexed as

PigmentationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDipteraEquidaeHairModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID27223616
PMCPMC4880349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.