Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27223437›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Establishment of a multimarker qPCR panel for the molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in blood samples of metastatic breast cancer patients during the course of palliative treatment.

Maren Bredemeier, Philippos Edimiris, Mitra Tewes, Pawel Mach, Bahriye Aktas, Doreen Schellbach, Jenny Wagner, Rainer Kimmig, Sabine Kasimir-Bauer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maren BredemeierDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Philippos EdimirisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mitra TewesDepartment of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pawel MachDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Bahriye AktasDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Doreen SchellbachQIAGEN Hannover GmbH, Langenhagen, Germany.
Jenny WagnerQIAGEN Hannover GmbH, Langenhagen, Germany.
Rainer KimmigDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Sabine Kasimir-BauerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cells (CTC) are discussed to be an ideal surrogate marker for individualized treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) since metastatic tissue is often difficult to obtain for repeated analysis. We established a nine gene qPCR panel to characterize the heterogeneous CTC population in MBC patients including epithelial CTC, their receptors (EPCAM, ERBB2, ERBB3, EGFR) CTC in Epithelial-Mesenchymal-Transition [(EMT); PIK3CA, AKT2), stem cell-like CTC (ALDH1) as well as resistant CTC (ERCC1, AURKA] to identify individual therapeutic targets.

resultsAt TP0, at least one marker was detected in 84%, at TP1 in 74% and at TP2 in 79% of the patients, respectively. The expression of ERBB2, ERBB3 and ERCC1 alone or in combination with AURKA was significantly associated with therapy failure. ERBB2 + CTC were only detected in patients not receiving ERBB2 targeted therapies which correlated with no response. Furthermore, patients responding at TP2 had a significantly prolonged overall-survival than patients never responding (p = 0.0090). PATIENTS AND

methods2 × 5 ml blood of 62 MBC patients was collected at the time of disease progression (TP0) and at two clinical staging time points (TP1 and TP2) after 8-12 weeks of chemo-, hormone or antibody therapy for the detection of CTC (AdnaTest EMT-2/StemCell Select™, QIAGEN Hannover GmbH, Germany). After pre-amplification, multiplex qPCR was performed. Establishment was performed using various cancer cell lines. PTPRC (Protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type C) and GAPDH served as controls.

conclusionsMonitoring MBC patients using a multimarker qPCR panel for the characterization of CTC might help to treat patients accordingly in the future.

Indexed as

Palliative CareTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCell Line, TumorEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsMonitoring, PhysiologicNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, Tumorcirculating tumor cellsmetastatic breast cancermultimarker gene panel

Identifiers

PMID27223437
PMCPMC5173087
OpenAlexW2401691535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.