Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27223303›Full record

ArticleNutrients2016

Impact of a High-Fat or High-Fiber Diet on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolic Markers in a Pig Model.

Sonja N Heinritz, Eva Weiss, Meike Eklund, Tobias Aumiller, Charlotte M E Heyer, Sabine Messner, Andreas Rings, Sandrine Louis, Stephan C Bischoff, Rainer Mosenthin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbiota Composition in Diverticular Disease: Implications for Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonja N HeinritzInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. sonja.heinritz@uni-hohenheim.de.
Eva WeissInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. eva.weiss@uni-hohenheim.de.
Meike EklundInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. meike.eklund@uni-hohenheim.de.
Tobias AumillerInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. tobias.aumiller@delacon.com.
Charlotte M E HeyerInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. charlotte.heyer@uni-hohenheim.de.
Sabine MessnerInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. sabinem@uni-hohenheim.de.
Andreas RingsDepartment of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. andreas.rings@uni-hohenheim.de.
Sandrine LouisDepartment of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. sandrine.louis@uni-hohenheim.de.
Stephan C BischoffDepartment of Nutritional Medicine, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. bischoff.stephan@uni-hohenheim.de.
Rainer MosenthinInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart 70599, Germany. rainer.mosenthin@uni-hohenheim.de.
University of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To further elaborate interactions between nutrition, gut microbiota and host health, an animal model to simulate changes in microbial composition and activity due to dietary changes similar to those in humans is needed. Therefore, the impact of two different diets on cecal and colonic microbial gene copies and metabolic activity, organ development and biochemical parameters in blood serum was investigated using a pig model. Four pigs were either fed a low-fat/high-fiber (LF), or a high-fat/low-fiber (HF) diet for seven weeks, with both diets being isocaloric. A hypotrophic effect of the HF diet on digestive organs could be observed compared to the LF diet (p < 0.05). Higher gene copy numbers of Bacteroides (p < 0.05) and Enterobacteriaceae (p < 0.001) were present in intestinal contents of HF pigs, bifidobacteria were more abundant in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Concentrations of acetate and butyrate were higher in LF pigs (p < 0.05). Glucose was higher in HF pigs, while glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) showed higher concentrations upon feeding the LF diet (p < 0.001). However, C-reactive protein (CRP) decreased with time in LF pigs (p < 0.05). In part, these findings correspond to those in humans, and are in support of the concept of using the pig as human model.

Indexed as

Diet, Fat-RestrictedDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBacteroidesBifidobacteriumBiomarkersCecumColonCrosses, GeneticDietary FiberDiet, High-FatDysbiosisEnterobacteriaceaeFermentationGastrointestinal ContentsIntestinal MucosaBiomarkersDietary Fiberdiethealthmicrobiotapig model

Identifiers

PMID27223303
PMCPMC4882729
OpenAlexW2402054029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.