Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27223168›Full record

ReviewAJR. American journal of roentgenology2016

Dual PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Probes as Tools for Imaging in Oncology.

Fei-Fei An, Mark Chan, Harikrishna Kommidi, Richard Ting

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An [Molecular pharmaceutics · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei-Fei An1 Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, 413 E 69th St, New York, NY, 10065.
Mark Chan1 Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, 413 E 69th St, New York, NY, 10065.
Harikrishna Kommidi1 Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, 413 E 69th St, New York, NY, 10065.
Richard Ting1 Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Innovations Institute (MI3), Weill Cornell Medicine, 413 E 69th St, New York, NY, 10065.

Funding

New PET /near IR-fluorescence tools for multimodal imaging in oncologyR00EB013904 · NIBIB · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI TING, RICHARD · 2014 to 2016
$724k
New PET /near IR-fluorescence tools for multimodal imaging in oncologyK99EB013904 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI TING, RICHARD · 2012 to 2013
$180k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB013904NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB013904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this article is to summarize advances in PET fluorescence resolution, agent design, and preclinical imaging that make a growing case for clinical PET fluorescence imaging.

conclusionExisting SPECT, PET, fluorescence, and MRI contrast imaging techniques are already deeply integrated into the management of cancer, from initial diagnosis to the observation and management of metastases. Combined positron-emitting fluorescent contrast agents can convey new or substantial benefits that improve on these proven clinical contrast agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorContrast MediaHumansNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographySpectrometry, FluorescenceSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredBiomarkers, TumorContrast Mediacancercontrast mediumfluorescencemultimodality imagingPET

Identifiers

PMID27223168
PMCPMC4958516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.