Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222918›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2016

Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Cigarette Design Feature Influence on ISO TNCO Yields.

Kimberly A Agnew-Heard, Vicki A Lancaster, Roberto Bravo, Clifford Watson, Matthew J Walters, Matthew R Holman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Free Radical, Carbonyl, and Nicotine Levels Produced by Juul Electronic Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A Survey of Nicotine Yields in Small Cigar Smoke: Influence of Cigar Design and Smoking Regimens.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly A Agnew-HeardCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Vicki A LancasterCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Roberto BravoNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention , 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, United States.
Clifford WatsonNational Center for Environmental Health, Centers For Disease Control and Prevention , 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, United States.
Matthew J WaltersCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Matthew R HolmanCenter for Tobacco Products, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
United States Food and Drug Administration · USNational Center for Environmental Health · US

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore how differences in cigarette physical design parameters influence tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide (TNCO) yields in mainstream smoke (MSS) using the International Organization of Standardization (ISO) smoking regimen. Standardized smoking methods were used to evaluate 50 U.S. domestic brand cigarettes and a reference cigarette representing a range of TNCO yields in MSS collected from linear smoking machines using a nonintense smoking regimen. Multivariate statistical methods were used to form clusters of cigarettes based on their ISO TNCO yields and then to explore the relationship between the ISO generated TNCO yields and the nine cigarette physical design parameters between and within each cluster simultaneously. The ISO generated TNCO yields in MSS are 1.1-17.0 mg tar/cigarette, 0.1-2.2 mg nicotine/cigarette, and 1.6-17.3 mg CO/cigarette. Cluster analysis divided the 51 cigarettes into five discrete clusters based on their ISO TNCO yields. No one physical parameter dominated across all clusters. Predicting ISO machine generated TNCO yields based on these nine physical design parameters is complex due to the correlation among and between the nine physical design parameters and TNCO yields. From these analyses, it is estimated that approximately 20% of the variability in the ISO generated TNCO yields comes from other parameters (e.g., filter material, filter type, inclusion of expanded or reconstituted tobacco, and tobacco blend composition, along with differences in tobacco leaf origin and stalk positions and added ingredients). A future article will examine the influence of these physical design parameters on TNCO yields under a Canadian Intense (CI) smoking regimen. Together, these papers will provide a more robust picture of the design features that contribute to TNCO exposure across the range of real world smoking patterns.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCarbon MonoxideInternational CooperationMultivariate AnalysisNicotineReference StandardsSmokeTarsTobacco ProductsCarbon MonoxideNicotineSmokeTarstobacco tar

Identifiers

PMID27222918
PMCPMC4916500
OpenAlexW2396266990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.