Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222750›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2016

In vitro assessment of pharmaceutical potential of ethosomes entrapped with terbinafine hydrochloride.

Syed Ahmed Iizhar, Ismail Ahmed Syed, Rukhsana Satar, Shakeel Ahmed Ansari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Lipid-Based Nanovesicular Drug Delivery Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syed Ahmed IizharDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ibn Sina National College of Medical Studies, Jeddah 21418, Saudi Arabia.
Ismail Ahmed SyedDepartment of Basic Sciences, Ibn Sina National College of Medical Studies, Jeddah 21418, Saudi Arabia.
Rukhsana SatarDepartment of Biochemistry, Ibn Sina National College of Medical Studies, Jeddah 21418, Saudi Arabia.
Shakeel Ahmed AnsariCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the entrapment of terbinafine hydrochloride (TH) in ethosomal vesicles via unsonicated and sonication method. Carbopol 934P was incorporated in the best formulation, F6, obtained by sonication method. The formulated ethosomal gel obtained as such i.e. F6(∗) was exploited to achieve a zero order release profile of TH. The composition includes phospholipid, ethanol and propylene glycol. Drug entrapment efficiency (DEE), in-vitro and ex-vivo drug diffusion studies, FT-IR and stability studies of the prepared ethosomes were investigated. The size and shape of F6 ethosomes vesicles were characterized by SEM. In-vitro drug release studies were performed using sigma dialysis membrane in phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 for 12 h while drug content was determined by HPLC. DEE was ranked from 55.33 ± 1.32% to 69.11 ± 2.11%. Highest DEE was seen with F6 ethosomal formulation with a vesicle size of 248 ± 1.02 nm. FT-IR studies confirmed that there was no chemical interaction between drug and excipients used in the formulation. Ex-vivo result suggested that drug diffusion observed after 12 h from F6(∗) and marketed cream (MR) formulations was 74.01 ± 0.62% and 61.45 ± 0.86%, respectively. The results of similarity factor (f 2 values) for MR and F6(∗) ethosomal gel were 85.14 and 42.63, respectively. It revealed that F6(∗) showed dissimilar dissolution profiles. Transdermal flux value for F6(∗) and MR was found to be 144.61 ± 1.28 μg/cm(2)/h and 121.6 ± 1.16 μg/cm(2)/h, respectively. This study disclosed that F6(∗) resides at targeted site for a relatively longer period of time thereby signifying the improved patient compliance.

Indexed as

DEE, drug entrapment efficiencyEthosomesIn-vitro drug diffusionMR, marketed creamPEG, polyethylene glycolPI, polydispersity indexTerbinafine HydrochlorideTH, Terbinafine HydrochlorideTransdermal flux

Identifiers

PMID27222750
PMCPMC4856831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.