Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222733›Full record

ArticleHealthcare technology letters2016

Predicting asthma exacerbations employing remotely monitored adherence.

Isabelle Killane, Imran Sulaiman, Elaine MacHale, Aoife Breathnach, Terence E Taylor, Martin S Holmes, Richard B Reilly, Richard W Costello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare technology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Isabelle KillaneClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Imran SulaimanClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital , Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin , Ireland.
Elaine MacHaleClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital , Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin , Ireland.
Aoife BreathnachClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital , Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland , Dublin , Ireland.
Terence E TaylorTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College , University of Dublin , Dublin 2 , Ireland.
Martin S HolmesTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College , University of Dublin , Dublin 2 , Ireland.
Richard B ReillyTrinity Centre for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland; School of Medicine, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Richard W CostelloClinical Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This Letter investigated the efficacy of a decision-support system, designed for respiratory medicine, at predicting asthma exacerbations in a multi-site longitudinal randomised control trial. Adherence to inhaler medication was acquired over 3 months from patients with asthma employing a dose counter and a remote monitoring adherence device which recorded participant's inhaler use: n = 184 (23,656 audio files), 61% women, age (mean ± sd) 49.3 ± 16.4. Data on occurrence of exacerbations was collected at three clinical visits, 1 month apart. The relative risk of an asthma exacerbation for those with good and poor adherence was examined employing a univariate and multivariate modified Poisson regression approach; adjusting for age, gender and body mass index. For all months dose counter adherence was significantly (p < 0.01) higher than remote monitoring adherence. Overall, those with poor adherence had a 1.38 ± 0.34 and 1.42 ± 0.39 (remotely monitored) and 1.25 ± 0.32 and 1.18 ± 0.31 (dose counter) higher relative risk of an exacerbation in model 1 and model 2, respectively. However, this was not found to be statistically significantly different. Remotely monitored adherence holds important clinical information and future research should focus on refining adherence and exacerbation measures. Decision-support systems based on remote monitoring may enhance patient-physician communication, possibly reducing preventable adverse events.

Indexed as

ageasthma exacerbationsbody mass indexdecision-support systemdecision support systemsdiseasesdose counter adherencegenderinhaler medicationmultisite longitudinal randomised control trialmultivariate modified Poisson regressionpatient monitoringpneumodynamicsPoisson distributionregression analysisremote monitoring adherence devicerespiratory medicineunivariate modified Poisson regression

Identifiers

PMID27222733
PMCPMC4814807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.