ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2016
[The problem of the use of Long-Lasting Insecticide Impregnated Mosquito Nets (LLIN) in children less than five years of age in Democratic Republic of Congo].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Effectiveness of Pyrethroid-Piperonyl Butoxide Nets Versus Standard Pyrethroid-Only Nets in Preventing Malaria in Children Under 10 Years Living in Kisantu Health Zone, Democratic Republic of the Congo.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Impact of mass distribution of long-lasting insecticide nets on the incidence of malaria in Lomami, Democratic Republic of Congo: a study based on electronic health record data (2018 - 2019).The Pan African medical journal · 2023Observational
- It Is Time to Strengthen the Malaria Control Policy of the Democratic Republic of Congo and Include Schools and School-Age Children in Malaria Control Measures.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalaria is a vector-borne infectious disease caused by parasites, which represents a major public health problem in tropical countries, especially Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aimed to identify the level of LLIN use in children less than 5 years in Mumbunda health zone.
methodsThe crosscutting study was conducted from 25 to 27 October 2013 and involved a random sample of 410 households with at least a child under 5 years.
resultsAmong households reported owning LLIN, 13.1% (n=54) of respondents reported having used it among children under 5 years and 80.2% to everybody. In 22.0% of cases, respondents cited lack of money as the reason for non-possession of LLIN. This study found that 79.8% of respondents declared having used LLIN to protect themselves against malaria and 66.3% to protect themselves against mosquito biking. LLIN was spread under shade for 24h before being used, for the first time, by 77.9% of the households. The respondents reported (15.3%, n=63) receiving information by the media about the use of mosquito net. Healthcare personnel was the most important source to demonstrate the correct way to use LLIN for 51.2% of the households.
conclusionThe success of Roll Back Malaria must necessarily pass through prevention, follow-up and evaluation of the use of impregnated mosquito nets in Mumbunda health zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.