ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2016
[Clinical and bacteriological profile of neonatal bacterial infection at Laquintinie Hospital, Douala (Cameroon)].
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bloodstream infections in Cameroon: a systematic review and meta-analysis.New microbes and new infections · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial resistance of Enterobacterales in Central Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of early-onset neonatal bacterial infection in a neonatal unit in Cameroon.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Incidence and risk factors of early-onset neonatal infections in Butembo: case of Katwa Health Zone from January 2020 to December 2022.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Admission Outcome and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacterial Isolates among Neonates with Suspected Sepsis in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Dessie, Northeastern Ethiopia.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe World Health Organization has estimated that the global incidence of neonatal deaths was 2,8 million in 2015, of which 47,6% were due to infections. These infections can affect newborns babies ages 0-1 month through 3 months.
methodsThis is a prospective study conducted from 1 March to 30 June 2015 in the Neonatology service of the Laquintinie Hospital at Douala. All symptomatic newborns with or without anamnestic criteria and all asymptomatic newborns, with at least an infectious risk and a positive blood culture or an abnormal blood count or positive C-reactive protein were included in the study.
resultsOf the 310 newborns enrolled in the study, 300 were retained for neonatal infection, corresponding to a total incidence of 96.8%. We performed 104 cultures, of which 25 were positive, corresponding to an incidence of confirmed neonatal infection of 24%. The factors associated with infection were unexplained preterm birth < 35 weeks of amenorrhea (45,1%) and neonatal resuscitation (34,8%). Fever (56%) and neurological disorders (48.8%) were the most frequent clinical symptoms. Gram-negative bacteria were the most frequent germs (56%). Imipenem (95%) and amikacin (66.7%) were the most effective antibiotics. Outcome was favorable in 66,4% of cases and the overall mortality rate was 33,6%.
conclusionThis study revealed a high prevalence of neonatal bacterial infection in this Hospital. Bacterial ecology was dominated by Gram-negative bacteria. It was recorded a significant resistance to the most widely used antibiotics and a fairly high mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.