Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222549›Full record

ReviewDiabetes care2016

Clinical Outcomes of Metabolic Surgery: Microvascular and Macrovascular Complications.

Ted D Adams, David E Arterburn, David M Nathan, Robert H Eckel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetes care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06374368 (Jejuno-Ileal and Jejuno-Colic Diversion as a New Bariatric Method in the Treatment of Diabetes and Obesity), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06374368 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Jejuno-Ileal and Jejuno-Colic Diversion as a New Bariatric Method in the Treatment of Diabetes and Obesity: Study Protocol for a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OstravaRan2019 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsObesity, Type2 DiabetesArmsjejuno-ileal diversion, jejuno-colic diversion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ted D AdamsIntermountain LiVe Well Center, Intermountain Healthcare, and Division of Cardiovascular Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT ted.adams@imail.org.
David E ArterburnGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA.
David M NathanDiabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Robert H EckelDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.
Harvard University · USIntermountain Healthcare · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Wendy M Kohrt · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Long-term Diabetes Remission and ComplicationsR01DK092317 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI ARTERBURN, DAVID ERIC · 2012 to 2015
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding of the long-term clinical outcomes associated with bariatric surgery has recently been advanced. Research related to the sequelae of diabetes-in particular, long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications-in patients who undergo weight-loss surgery is imperative to this pursuit. While numerous randomized control trials have assessed glucose control with bariatric surgery compared with intensive medical therapy, bariatric surgery outcome data relating to microvascular and macrovascular complications have been limited to observational studies and nonrandomized clinical trials. As a result, whether bariatric surgery is associated with a long-term reduction in microvascular and macrovascular complications when compared with current intensive glycemic control therapy cannot be determined because the evidence is insufficient. However, the consistent salutary effects of bariatric surgery on diabetes remission and glycemic improvement support the opportunity (and need) to conduct high-quality studies of bariatric surgery versus intensive glucose control. This review provides relevant background information related to the treatment of diabetes, hyperglycemia, and long-term complications; reports clinical findings (to date) with bariatric surgery; and identifies ongoing research focusing on long-term vascular outcomes associated with bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesHumansHyperglycemiaObesity, MorbidRemission InductionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID27222549
PMCPMC5562446
OpenAlexW2398835436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.