Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27222244›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Comparison of the harmonic focus and the thunderbeat for open thyroidectomy.

Sam Van Slycke, Jean-Pierre Gillardin, Klaas Van Den Heede, Joan Minguet, Hubert Vermeersch, Nele Brusselaers

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. LigaSure small jaw versus conventional neck dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Complications associated with energy-based devices during thyroidectomy from 2010-2020.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Comparing LigasureGland surgery · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sam Van SlyckeDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw (OLV) Clinic Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium. dr.samvanslycke@gmail.com.
Jean-Pierre GillardinDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw (OLV) Clinic Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Klaas Van Den HeedeDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, Onze-Lieve-Vrouw (OLV) Clinic Aalst, Moorselbaan 164, 9300, Aalst, Belgium.
Joan MinguetEuropean Institute of Cancer Research, Carrer del Passeig 2, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Hubert VermeerschDepartment of Head, Neck and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Nele BrusselaersUpper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Norra Stationsgatan 67, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAn effective method for controlling haemostasis during open thyroidectomy procedures is crucial because of the high risks of haemorrhage and neck haematoma. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of the integrated ultrasonic/bipolar Thunderbeat™ for this procedure.

methodsThis retrospective non-inferiority study compared the Thunderbeat™ and the ultrasonic Harmonic Focus® devices in 761 consecutive patients receiving a partial or total open thyroidectomy (with or without neck dissection). The main outcomes were duration of surgery, blood loss, and length of hospitalisation. Secondary outcomes were occurrence of hypocalcaemia, recurrent nerve paralysis, or other post-operative complications. A non-inferiority logistic regression approach was used to evaluate primary outcomes, adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, type of surgery, anaesthesiology score, and indication (benign or malign).

resultsThe data demonstrated that the Thunderbeat was non-inferior to the Focus in terms of duration of surgery, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Furthermore, subgroup analyses showed non-inferiority of the Thunderbeat for partial thyroidectomy (all three outcomes), total thyroidectomy (duration of surgery and length of hospitalisation), and total thyroidectomy with neck dissection (length of hospitalisation). In terms of recurrent nerve paralysis and post-operative complications, the Thunderbeat performed at least as well as the Focus; however, no conclusions could be drawn regarding the occurrence of post-operative hypocalcaemia.

conclusionIn a cohort of patients that underwent partial or total thyroidectomy, the Thunderbeat appeared to be at least as good as the Harmonic Focus.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHemostasis, SurgicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThyroid DiseasesThyroidectomyTreatment OutcomeUltrasonic Surgical ProceduresYoung AdultHaemostasisHarmonic focusNon-inferiorityThunderbeatThyroidectomyUltrasonic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.